Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Crossword
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital EditionCrossword

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition

Crossword


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

OverviewSymptomsDiagnosisTreatmentReferences

17 Apr 2023

Update on total and partial IV anaesthesia

Anne-Sophie Van Wijnsberghe, Carl Bradbrook

Job Title



Update on total and partial IV anaesthesia

Image: © ravi kumar/EyeEm / Adobe Stock

The concept of “balanced anaesthesia” has been known for a long time. It consists of a single drug or a combination of drugs providing the different parts of anaesthesia, such as hypnosis, analgesia and muscle relaxation1. The best anaesthetic protocol reduces the risk to the patient and achieves the end points required to complete the proposed procedure.

Total IV anaesthesia (TIVA) is the administration of combinations of IV anaesthetic and analgesic drugs to maintain anaesthesia. The first TIVA was documented in dogs in 16562.

Partial IV anaesthesia (PIVA) allows use of lower dose of the primary general anaesthetic and limits potentially harmful side effects, yet still provides good-quality anaesthesia3.

Infusion of drugs can also reduce the inspired concentration of inhaled agents. These techniques are applied to many veterinary and medical situations1, and drug choice must be matched to patient health status to allow completion of the procedure, and maintain patient safety.

Why should we consider introducing these techniques in our daily practice?

Good analgesia and stable anaesthesia

Meeting all criteria of general anaesthesia by using a single anaesthetic may expose the patient to additional risks associated with the adverse effects of that drug. For example, increasing an inhalant agent concentration will result in physiologic changes in a dose-dependent manner1.

They are characterised as myocardial depression, vasodilation, hypotension and hypoventilation. Isoflurane and sevoflurane have vasodilatory properties, negatively impact cardiac contractility and result in hypotension, and may result in harm1.

On the other hand, the anaesthetic-sparing effects of the anaesthetic/analgesic infusions can reduce the inspired concentration of the volatile agent and, therefore, reduce its detrimental haemodynamic effects4. Therefore, PIVA and TIVA techniques provide superior haemodynamic stability5,6 and potent volatile anaesthetic-sparing capability.

Many drugs can be chosen, and their benefits change depending on the species: studies have shown that morphine, lidocaine and ketamine infusions reduce isoflurane requirements by 48%, 29% and 25%, respectively, in dogs7. Moreover, in highly debilitated patients or those with a severely painful condition, PIVA/TIVA can be used for more marked anaesthetic-sparing effects1.

These techniques provide a more stable plasma concentration, and an accurate level of anaesthesia and analgesia throughout the procedure. Adding supplemental analgesia to inhalant anaesthesia results in a better quality of pain control and improves safety by reducing inhalation drug dose1.

The infusion can be stopped at the end of the anaesthetic period or even continued into the recovery phase.

Smoother recovery

Recovery may be smoother. Drugs can be continued and gradually decreased into the postoperative phase for both sedation and analgesia, allowing more control and a quieter emergence from general anaesthesia into recovery1.

No facilities

Where no facilities exist for inhalational anaesthesia (in some rural spay/neuter programmes or critical care patients under ventilator support), TIVA is commonly used for anaesthesia8,9.

Avoid accidental overdose of volatile agent

An unnecessary increase in volatile agent concentration may occur and enhance the risk of overdosage when the clinician is uncomfortable with reducing vaporiser settings from more familiar levels1.

Greenhouse gas impact

When TIVA is used, personnel exposure and environmental pollution risks from the inhalant agent are reduced to zero. Isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane are substituted halogenated hydrocarbons, which are environmentally harmful and potentially dangerous to personnel.

By decreasing patient, veterinary personnel and environmental exposure, anaesthesia is successfully administered with a greener outcome10.

Human medicine

Over the past two decades, changes in human anaesthesia practice have occurred to improve the quality of anaesthesia and patient experience10. The first objective is to decrease anaesthesia recovery time and speed discharge. The second is to decrease post-anaesthesia nausea and vomiting, and the last is to decrease postoperative opioid use due to addiction concerns.

Human research has shown that anaesthesia associated with PIVA/TIVA has equivalent or better recovery time post-anaesthesia analgesia, and reduces the incidence of post-anaesthesia nausea and vomiting11,12.

What are their disadvantages?

As with other anaesthesia techniques, disadvantages may exist to using PIVA or TIVA in daily practice10. Respiratory depression can be noticeable with TIVA and even exacerbated by the additional use of inhalant agents (PIVA)1. Therefore, ventilatory support may be required.

Close patient monitoring is required during the postoperative phase to identify potential loss of airway reflexes and excessive sedation. During TIVA administration, a breathing system and anaesthetic machine should be used for patient respiratory support, oxygen delivery and carbon dioxide removal10.

Other potential disadvantages of TIVA/PIVA are personal training to assess patient responses, concern regarding complexity versus inhalation agents and familiarity with equipment. An initial barrier may also exist in requiring a comfort level with drug calculations and infusion rates1,10. In addition, using PIVA alongside inhalational anaesthesia may be more costly and challenging than potential benefits1,10.

Application of TIVA/PIVA

To maintain an effective receptor occupation and a desired effect, an infusion needs to reach the drug’s plasma concentration.

Although it seems simple, it may be challenging to achieve this because the compartmental redistribution, the biotransformation and the drug clearance are different, and specified for each drug. The best match is to achieve the steady-state plasma concentration of a drug – with its redistribution, biotransformation and clearance – for the duration of the general anaesthesia10,13.

The time it takes to achieve peak effect is called “effect-site equilibrium”. An IV bolus of the drugs increases the plasma concentration and allows rapid delivery to the site of action.

In human medicine, advanced techniques and algorithms have been studied and developed into delivery systems (computers, syringe pumps) for controlling drug delivery, and achieving a faster and steady state14. In veterinary medicine, this discovery of information is only just the beginning15,16.

A fundamental strategic goal in formulating TIVA/PIVA protocols is to combine drugs for an effect greater than each alone – this is called “synergism”10.

One to three drugs are usually selected along with a volatile agent: mu-opioid agonists are always chosen for their analgesia properties with haemodynamic stability; alpha-2 adrenergic agonists for sedation and analgesia, lidocaine for its anti-inflammatory effects, ketamine for its sound analgesic effects with modulation of central sensitisation processes, benzodiazepines for haemodynamic stability, and injectable anaesthetic drugs for haemodynamic stability and anaesthetic-sparing effects1.

Drugs used for PIVA/TIVA

Propofol

Propofol has been widely studied as part of TIVA and suggested for PIVA techniques17,18. A sub-anaesthetic infusion rate can also be used alongside inhalant anaesthetic.

Its flexibility in dosage produces a range of responses ranging from light to profound sedation with good muscle relaxation. It is rapidly and consistently metabolised, resulting in a short in vivo half-life after a single dose or a prolonged constant rate infusion (CRI) administration, still resulting in a rapid recovery after drug discontinuation.

The evaluation of anaesthetic depth by eye reflexes and position changes are similar between propofol and the inhalant agent. For these reasons, propofol is a human and veterinary foundation drug19,20, and is an “ideal TIVA/PIVA drug”. However, it can accumulate in cats because propofol glucuronidation occurs slower. Therefore, prolonged recoveries might occur in cats and a gradual decrease in propofol rate is required21.

Alfaxalone

Alfaxalone is a steroid-based injectable anaesthetic for use in cats and dogs, and has the same mechanism of action as propofol and thiopental. It shares many qualities described for propofol and has similar pharmacokinetics.

Reports of the use of alfaxalone have been published for TIVA22-24. Delayed recovery has been observed in cats when alfaxalone TIVA is used; although, this might have been due to concurrently administered drugs25. Nevertheless, alfaxalone shows promise for TIVA, and its safe use for PIVA requires thorough evaluation in cats.

Opioids

Opioids are often given in combinations at premedication, and are ideal for intraoperative analgesia and complementary inhalational anaesthesia. Their activity is prolonged intraoperatively by infusions.

Opioids with high activity at the mu-opioid receptor have an anaesthetic-sparing effect. In dogs, mu-opioid agonists can decrease the concentration of inhaled agents required, by as much as 50% to 60%, for maintaining a surgical plane of anaesthesia1,7,26.

“The opioids commonly used for infusions in veterinary anaesthesia include morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil”1. After an initial loading dose, they share the characteristic of producing a rapid effect and maintaining a steady-state plasma level.

The most commonly used opioid in veterinary TIVA is fentanyl. However, a time delay in developing a steady-state plasma concentration has been observed in studies evaluating in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics, after CRI administration of up to 180 to 240 minutes. It is, therefore, necessary to administer a loading dose to reach the steady state faster1,10.

A “ceiling effect” also exists where higher-dose rates do not decrease volatile agent requirement further27.

In cats, the anaesthetic-sparing effect, with the same mu-opioid agonists, is less pronounced: a 15% to 20% reduction in inhaled anaesthetic requirement is observed28.

Mu-opioid agonist infusions provide good haemodynamic stability, but may induce bradycardia, resulting from the increased vagal tone, and may require anticholinergics to correct. Mu-opioid agonists also have respiratory depressant effects, and ventilation support may be required.

Ketamine

Ketamine is a dissociative anaesthetic drug, and its use is widespread both intraoperatively and postoperatively for its analgesic properties29. Its analgesic property is due to inhibition of the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which enhances pain transmission, activated by central sensitisation (continuous noxious stimulation).

The NMDA receptor is especially important in painful long-term conditions. It is used as an adjunct to improve sedation and inhibit pain signal upregulation (wind-up) in the CNS. It produces minimum psychoactive or physiologic consequence at low doses, and may delay recovery when higher doses are administered, although this does not seem to be a concern clinically when adjunct doses are administered29.

Intraoperatively, ketamine infusions can be anaesthetic-sparing of around 25% at the same infusion rates used for postoperative analgesia (0.3mg/kg/h to 0.6mg/kg/h), but higher infusion rates (3.0mg/kg/h to 6.0mg/kg/h) can have a powerful anaesthetic-sparing ability of 40% to 45%30,31.

Increased systemic blood pressure and body temperature, mydriasis, regurgitation, cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular premature complexes, and dysphoria in conscious patients may occur. Unwanted effects may subside as the dose is reduced.

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, produces deep sedation in many species and provides good analgesia32. The combined sedative and analgesic qualities produce a strong anaesthetic-sparing effect of up to 60%32-34. Moreover, combining these with opioids produces a superior quality of analgesia in dogs.

However, all alpha-2 adrenergic agonists cause vasoconstriction, bradycardia, decreased cardiac contractility, and lowered cardiac output34,35. Hyperglycaemia and increased urine production are also reported. Fluid therapy may be required to compensate for fluid losses. Ventilatory support may be required – especially when these agonists are used with opioids.

Dexmedetomidine is used in PIVA and TIVA protocols owing to its profound sedation and analgesic qualities. The lower dose of dexmedetomidine can achieve moderate sedation and analgesia with less marked haemodynamic changes. Dexmedetomidine has residual analgesia and a short recovery after CRI discontinuation, which is attractive. It also has a specific antagonist if needed36-38.

Benzodiazepine tranquilisers

With their excellent sedative and haemodynamic stability properties, benzodiazepines are helpful for PIVA/TIVA techniques39. They are often used in combination with mu-opioid agonists in critically ill patients39,40. These drugs are no analgesics, but provide increased centrally mediated muscle relaxation for some procedures. High infusion rates have been shown to reduce enflurane requirements by 55% in dogs40.

Diazepam and midazolam both produce dose-dependent sedation and muscle relaxation. They have complex and extended biotransformation. Due to the biological activity of first-generation and second-generation metabolites, the duration of action is prolonged41,42. This factor makes them less enticing, unless a benzodiazepine-specific antagonist, like flumazenil, is available43. Therefore, as a slow recovery can occur, flumazenil may help to antagonise it.

Neuromuscular blocking drugs

If complete skeletal muscle relaxation is required, neuromuscular blocking drugs can be helpful.

Newer neuromuscular blocking agents produce good neuromuscular relaxation following the loading dose. They are also predictable and have a short duration of action following single-dose administration. Cisatracurium is a popular choice owing to its relatively rapid onset (1 to 2 minutes) and predictable duration (30 to 35 minutes) of effect44.

Lidocaine

Lidocaine has a predictable duration of action and analgesic effects at a low-dose CRI, which may be useful for inflammatory conditions. It provides effective analgesia for visceral pain for soft tissue procedures (including intra-abdominal and intrathoracic techniques). In conscious dogs, lidocaine has sedative actions at high infusion rates (50mcg/kg/minute)45 and produces an anaesthetic-sparing effect between 20% to 40% in dogs.

However, in a feline study, a bolus dose of lidocaine was shown to be haemodynamically depressant. Therefore, its use in cats is not recommended46. Further studies may clarify whether lidocaine infusion techniques are a valuable tool in feline anaesthetic management.

Because of their cardiotoxic properties, long-duration local anaesthetics, such as bupivacaine, are not suitable substitutes for IV infusions.

Delivery systems

To deliver a drug at a constant rate, a devoted delivery device is required. The calculated drug doses may be mixed into a fluid such as 0.9% saline, and infused using a standard fluid pump or gravity dripped using a drip controller.

Although infusions from fluid bags are less expensive, they may result in inaccurate delivery and difficulty in changing infusion rates if more than one drug is mixed in a single bag. Syringe drivers or syringe pumps are programmed to give a precise and desired rate, and changes may easily be made1,10.

In human medicine, target-controlled infusion pumps are set up with pre-programmed PK-PD data for each drug. The patient information is entered by the operator, and the infusion pump automatically calculates and delivers the drug dose to maintain a target plasma concentration. Several articles have been written regarding this approach in veterinary anaesthesia1,10.

Long microbore tubing extension sets are available with low priming volumes and are useful for attaching the drug syringe to the patient fluid therapy line, and avoiding excessive drug waste.

Suggested loading doses and constant rate infusion (CRI) doses for total IV anaesthesia and partial IV anaesthesia used in small animals
Drug class Drug name Loading dose (IV administration) CRI dose (IV administration)
Opioids Morphine 0.15mg/kg to 0.3mg/kg 0.1mg/kg/hour to 0.2mg/kg/hour
Fentanyl 3µg/kg to 5µg/kg 5µg/kg/hour to 20µg/kg/hour
Alpha-2 agonist Dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg to 3µg/kg 0.5µg/kg/hour to 5µg/kg/hour
Benzodiazepine Diazepam 0.2mg/kg to 0.4mg/kg 0.2mg/kg/hour to 0.4mg/kg/hour
Midazolam 0.2mg/kg to 0.4mg/kg 0.2mg/kg/hour to 0.4mg/kg/hour
Dissociative Ketamine 0.25mg/kg to 0.5mg/kg 2µg/kg/min to 20µg/kg/min
Local anaesthetic* Lidocaine 1mg/kg to 2mg/kg 25µg/kg/min to 50µg/kg/min
Sedative hypnotic Propofol 2mg/kg to 6mg/kg 0.1mg/kg/min to 0.6mg/kg/min
Alfaxolone 2mg/kg to 3mg/kg 0.05mg/kg/min to 0.15mg/kg/min
Neuromuscular blocker† Atracurium 0.3mg/kg to 0.5mg/kg 4µg/kg/min to 9µg/kg/min
Cisatracurium 0.2mg/kg 2µg/kg/min
*Only for dogs.
†Ventilation support required.

Summary

To produce safe anaesthesia and avoid unwanted effects associated with agents, TIVA and PIVA are further options that may be used. In many hospital-based centres, they are used to meet the needs for safer anaesthesia. Although veterinary TIVA/PIVA knowledge is still sparse compared with human medicine, research on the pharmacokinetics of injectable anaesthetic drugs continues to expand and the literature is still constantly evolving.

In small animal veterinary medicine, future objectives must include the availability of delivery devices (target-controlled infusion) and the development of pharmacokinetic profiles for parenteral anaesthetic drugs.

Development of equipment, drugs and patient monitoring techniques will make more options available for clinical use in the future.

  • Use of some of the drugs mentioned in this article is under the veterinary medicine cascade.

References

  • Duke T (2013). Partial intravenous anesthesia in cats and dogs, Can Vet J 54(3): 276-282.
  • Chong CT (2018). Historical perspectives on total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), J Anesth Hist 4(1): 60.
  • Ilkiw JE (1999). Balanced anesthetic techniques in dogs and cats, Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 14(1): 27-37.
  • Ilkiw JE et al (1994). The cardiovascular sparing effect of fentanyl and atropine, administered to enflurane anesthetized dogs, Can J Vet Res 58(4): 248-253.
  • Liehmann L et al (2006). A comparison of cardiorespiratory variables during isoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia for surgery in injured cats, Vet Anaesth Analg 33(3): 158-168.
  • Wong GLS and Morton S (2011). Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in pediatric cardiac anesthesia, Paediatr Anaesth 21(5): 560-566.
  • Muir WW et al (2003). Effects of morphine, lidocaine, ketamine, and morphine-lidocaine-ketamine drug combination on minimum alveolar concentration in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane, Am J Vet Res 64(9): 1,155-1,160.
  • Ethier MR et al (2008). Evaluation of the efficacy and safety for use of two sedation and analgesia protocols to facilitate assisted ventilation of healthy dogs, Am J Vet Res 69(10): 1,351-1,359.
  • Ko JC and Berman AG (2010). Anesthesia in shelter medicine, Top Companion Anim Med 25(2): 92-97.
  • Raffe MR (2020). Total intravenous anesthesia for the small animal critical patient, Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 50(6): 1,433–1,444.
  • McIlroy EI and Leslie K (2019). Total intravenous anesthesia in ambulatory care, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 32(6): 703-707.
  • Absalom AR and Struys MMRF (2007). An overview of TCI and TIVA (2nd edn), Academia Press, Ghent.
  • Al-Rifai Z and Mulvey D (2016). Principles of total intravenous anaesthesia: basic pharmacokinetics and model descriptions, BJA Educ 16(3): 92-97.
  • Struys MMRF et al (2016). The history of target-controlled infusion, Anesth Analg 122(1): 56-69.
  • Pyendorp BH (2019). Target-controlled infusions in animals – why aren’t we there yet? 2019 International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium Proceedings, Washington, DC: 25-28.
  • Pyendorp BH (2019). Pharmacokinetics in the clinical setting: new insights, 2019 International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium Proceedings, Washington, DC: 29-36.
  • Correa MDA et al (2007). Effects of remifentanil infusion regimens on cardiovascular function and responses to noxious stimulation in propofol-anesthetized cats, Am J Vet Res 68(9): 932-940.
  • Kuusela E et al (2003). A comparison of propofol infusion and propofol/isoflurane anaesthesia in dexmedetomidine premedicated dogs, J Vet Pharmacol Therap 26(3): 199-204.
  • Chan V and Skowno J (2018). A practical approach to propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in children, Paediatr Anaesthes Tutor 392: 27.
  • Gepts E et al (1987). Disposition of propofol administered as constant rate intravenous infusions in humans, Anesth Analg 66(12): 1,256-1,263.
  • Pascoe PJ et al (2006). The effect of the duration of propofol administration on recovery from anesthesia in cats, Vet Anaesth Analg 33(1): 2-7.
  • Ambros B et al (2008). Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy and cardiopulmonary effects of continuous rate infusions of alfaxalone-2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and propofol in dogs, Am J Vet Res 69(11): 1,391-1,398.
  • Suarez MA et al (2012). Comparison of alfaxalone and propofol administered as total intravenous anaesthesia for ovariohysterectomy in dogs, Vet Anaesth Analg 39(3): 236-244.
  • Pypendop BH et al (2018). Comparison of two intravenous anesthetic infusion regimens for alfaxalone in cats, Vet Anaesth Analg 45(4): 459-466.
  • Beths T et al (2009). Total intravenous anesthesia in cats: Evaluation of alfaxalone in hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin to induce and maintain anesthesia in feral and domestic cats undergoing neutering procedures, Abstracts presented at the 10th World Congress of Veterinary Anaesthesia, Glasgow.
  • Steffey EP et al (1994). Morphine-isoflurane interaction in dogs, swine and rhesus monkeys, J Vet Pharmacol Therap 17(3): 202-210.
  • Murphy MR and Hug CC Jr (1982). The anesthetic potency of fentanyl in terms of its reduction of enflurane, Anesthesiology 57(6): 485-488.
  • Ilkiw JE et al (2002). Effects of morphine, butorphanol, buprenorphine, U50488H on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in cats, Am J Vet Res 63(8): 1,198-1,202.
  • Wagner AE et al (2002). Use of low doses of ketamine administered by constant rate infusion used as an adjunct for postoperative analgesia in the dog, J Am Vet Med Assoc 221(1): 72-75.
  • Solano AM et al (2006). Effect of intravenous administration of ketamine on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in anesthetized dogs, Am J Vet Res 67(1): 21-25.
  • Wilson J et al (2008). Effects of intravenous lidocaine, ketamine and the combination on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in dogs, Vet Anaesth Analg 35(4): 289-296.
  • Ansah OB et al (2000). Correlation between serum concentrations following continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine or medetomidine in cats and their sedative and analgesic effects, J Vet Pharmacol Therap 23(1): 1-8.
  • Pascoe PJ et al (2006). Changes in the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane and some cardiopulmonary measurements during three continuous infusion rates of dexmedetomidine in dogs, Vet Anaesth Analg 33(2): 97-103.
  • Souza SS et al (2010). Cardiopulmonary and isoflurane-sparing effects of epidural or intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine in cats undergoing surgery with epidural lidocaine, Vet Anaesth Analg 37(2): 106-115.
  • Pypendop BH and Verstegen JP (1998). Hemodynamic effects of medetomidine in the dog: a dose titration study, Vet Surg 27(6): 612-622.
  • Carter JE et al (2010). The hemodynamic effect of medetomidine continuous rate infusions in the dog, Vet Anaesth Analg 37(3): 197-206.
  • Simon BT et al (2018). The clinical effects of a low dose dexmedetomidine constant rate infusion in isoflurane anesthetized cats, Vet J 234: 55-60.
  • Uilenreef JJ et al (2008). Dexmedetomidine continuous rate infusion during isoflurane anaesthesia in canine surgical patients, Vet Anaesth Analg 35(1): 1-12.
  • Jones DJ et al (1979). Cardiovascular responses to diazepam and midazolam maleate in the dog, Anesthesiology 51(5): 430-434.
  • Hall RI et al (1988). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam in the enflurane-anesthetized dog, J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 16(3): 251-262.
  • Löscher W and Frey HH (1981). Pharmacokinetics of diazepam in the dog, Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 254(2): 180-195.
  • Court MH and Greenblatt DJ (1992). Pharmacokinetics and preliminary observations of behavioral changes following administration of midazolam to dogs, J Vet Pharmacol Ther 15(4): 343-350.
  • Hellyer PW et al (2001). Effects of diazepam and flumazenil on minimum alveolar concentrations for dogs anesthetized with isoflurane or a combination of isoflurane and fentanyl, Am J Vet Res 62(4): 555-560.
  • Quandt J (2009). Neuromuscular blockers. In Silverstein D and Hopper K (eds), Small Animal Critical Care Medicine, Elsevier, St Louis: 780-783.
  • MacDougall LM et al (2009). Antinociceptive, cardiopulmonary, and sedative effects of five different infusion rates of lidocaine in conscious dogs, Vet Anaesth Analg 36(5): 512-522.
  • Pypendop BH and Ilkiw JE (2005). Assessment of the hemodynamic effects of lidocaine administered IV in isoflurane-anesthetized cats, Am J Vet Res 66(4): 661-668.

Meet the authors

author_img

Anne-Sophie Van Wijnsberghe

Job Title
author_img

Carl Bradbrook

Job Title