Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital Edition

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

13 Mar 2023

Lameness: diagnosis advice for first opinion practitioners

author_img

Laura Quiney

Job Title



Lameness: diagnosis advice for first opinion practitioners

Image: © Dirk70 / Adobe Stock

ABSTRACT

Lameness investigations can be challenging – particularly for recently graduated or inexperienced veterinarians. Abundant research can be found within this field. However, it can be difficult for veterinarians to keep up to date with publications, critically assess the information, and determine whether and how to apply it to clinical practice.

This article provides an overview of some important recent advances in gait assessment, diagnostic anaesthesia and diagnostic imaging.

Accurate diagnosis of lameness requires a logical and judicious approach at each stage of the examination.

The complexity of investigation can be highly variable and ranges from relatively simple cases, such as acute onset lameness accompanied by localising clinical signs to poor performance or multi-limb lameness.

With the appropriate application of knowledge and techniques, and the availability of portable diagnostic equipment, high-quality examinations can be achieved in ambulatory settings.

However, instances exist where referral to a specialist clinic may be more cost and time effective, or should be considered to ensure the best outcome for the horse, owner and veterinarian. These include:

  • Adequate facilities and competent handlers are not available.
  • Complex or time-consuming investigations (for example, multi-limb lameness, poor performance or unusual presentations).
  • Advanced imaging techniques are, or may, be required.

The approach to reaching a diagnosis for lameness or poor performance can be simplified into five logical steps, which apply to the majority of cases:

  1. Recognising or understanding the problem (case history).
  2. Physical examination (visual appraisal and manual palpation/manipulation).
  3. Gait assessment under the appropriate circumstances (for example, to include ridden exercise unless contraindicated or unnecessary).
  4. Diagnostic anaesthesia to localise the source(s) of pain causing lameness or poor performance.
  5. Diagnostic imaging of the painful regions.

“Diagnosis” implies certainty and infallibility of the diagnostic process. Lameness evaluation has been described countless times as both an art and a science. Limitations exist to every stage of lameness investigation; therefore, both approaches must be used.

William Osler (1849-1919) once described medicine as “a science of uncertainty and an art of probability”. The author believes that it is also a very fitting description of how lameness should be approached by equine veterinarians. Nevertheless, abundant research has been undertaken related to lameness investigation, which drives us towards a more certain science and a more defined art.

Recent advances that can be directly applied to lameness investigation in first opinion practice have been made in three key areas: gait assessment, diagnostic anaesthesia and diagnostic imaging.

Gait assessment

Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram

A plethora of gait abnormalities, movement adaptations and behaviours (collectively, the clinical signs of lameness and poor performance) exist that may indicate the presence of pain. Gait assessment is subjective and it is well recognised that poor agreement often exists among veterinarians, including highly experienced clinicians and specialists (Hardeman et al, 2022).

Lameness is considerably under-recognised by the UK horse-riding population (Greve and Dyson, 2014), and experience suggests it can be under-recognised by veterinarians, too. It can be difficult for inexperienced veterinarians to differentiate pain-related behaviours from naughty horses, or behaviours that are purportedly normal for an individual horse.

The Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram (RHpE) has been developed to facilitate the identification of the presence of pain as a cause of lameness or poor performance (Dyson et al, 2018a; Dyson et al, 2018b; Dyson et al, 2020; Dyson, 2020). Data has been documented for its application in approximately 1,500 horses to date (Berger et al, 2022).

The ethogram is a tool consisting of 24 potentially pain-related behaviours, which are documented over a 5 to 10-minute period of ridden exercise. A score of 8 out of 24 or higher indicates a high likelihood of the presence of lameness (Dyson and Van Dijk, 2020).

Following diagnostic anaesthesia, a significantly lower RHpE score indicates abolition or substantial alleviation of pain (Dyson et al, 2018b; Dyson and Van Dijk, 2020).

This is a simple field tool, which, with some training, demystifies the sometimes intangible art of gait assessment (Equitopia, 2019). Moreover, encouraging the horse-owning public to use this tool to identify musculoskeletal pain should result in earlier presentation for investigation, and consequently, improved prognosis and outcomes to treatment.

Objective gait analysis

Plentiful research activity exists surrounding objective gait analysis and, in recent years, this technology has become increasingly used in clinical practice.

Objective gait analysis is more sensitive for movement asymmetry than the human eye, and reduces observer and expectation bias (Hardeman et al, 2022). However, this technology is probably still in its infancy, and the objective evaluation of a limited number of the potential gait abnormalities that may indicate pain causing lameness, or poor performance, (namely, poll displacement and pelvic movement asymmetry) is a major limitation.

Not all horses with pain causing lameness display movement asymmetry; for example, the horse with bilaterally symmetrical pain causing lameness in both forelimbs or hindlimbs. Furthermore, data exists primarily for evaluation of horses in hand and on the lunge (Hammarberg et al, 2016; Hardeman et al, 2022).

Lameness or poor performance is sometimes only apparent in the ridden horse. A recent study demonstrated that despite poor agreement of lameness grade among veterinarians, correlation existed between subjective and quantitative assessments (Hardeman et al, 2022).

Objective gait analysis could be used as an adjunctive technique to subjective gait assessment, and to reduce expectation bias following diagnostic anaesthesia, but cannot be used as the primary means of gait assessment. This technology is not immune to user error; incorrect sensor placement can produce misleading results (Serra Bragança et al, 2018; Pfau and Weller, 2017).

While objective gait analysis is an important research tool, it is prudent to maintain greater reliance on subjective analysis in clinical practice.

Horses grazing in a field Image: © Dirk70 / Adobe Stock
Image: © Dirk70 / Adobe Stock

Diagnostic anaesthesia

The specificity of diagnostic anaesthesia techniques relies on accuracy of needle placement and direction, and the volume of local anaesthetic solution injected (Nagy and Malton, 2015; Nagy et al, 2012; Nagy et al, 2010; Pilsworth and Dyson, 2015).

Proximal diffusion, communication between adjacent synovial spaces and desensitisation of structures adjacent to synovial spaces reduce the specificity of diagnostic anaesthetic techniques (Gough et al, 2002; Harper et al, 2007).

Two recent studies have further demonstrated the limited specificity of these diagnostic techniques. Desensitisation of the medial and lateral heel bulbs occurred in six out of eight horses within 30 to 60 minutes following intrathecal anaesthesia of the carpal sheath (Miagkoff and Bonilla, 2021). Half were still fully desensitised at 180 minutes.

Re-evaluation following carpal sheath anaesthesia should, therefore, be performed within 15 minutes and, if required, diagnostic anaesthesia distal to the carpus should be delayed until at least three hours later, or performed on a separate occasion.

Similarly, intra-articular anaesthesia of the stifle (the medial and lateral femorotibial joints and femoropatellar joint) improved or abolished induced foot lameness (Radtke et al, 2020). Up to 50% improvement (confirmed by objective gait analysis) within 30 minutes was reported in three out of nine horses. It is proposed that while abolition of – or a greater than 50%  improvement in – lameness within 30 minutes is likely to indicate stifle region pain, less than 50% improvement within 30 minutes or substantial improvement after 30 minutes may not reflect pain localised to the stifle region.

Diagnostic anaesthesia of the distal aspect of the limb should, therefore, be performed on a separate occasion to rule in or out distal limb pain.

Accuracy of needle placement may be improved by employing an ultrasound-guided approach to needle placement (Bellitto et al, 2022a). In this study, 24 horses that required tibial perineural anaesthesia for lameness investigation were randomly assigned to an ultrasound-guided injection or blind injection group. Successful anaesthesia of the tibial nerve was determined by loss of skin sensation in the heel bulbs and the plantaromedial aspect of the proximal metatarsus (Bellitto et al, 2022b).

All horses in the ultrasound-guided group (13 out of 13) had a loss of skin sensation following tibial perineural anaesthesia, compared with 1 out of 11 horses in the blind injection group (Bellitto et al, 2022a). The authors recommend that ultrasound-guided tibial perineural anaesthesia is performed preferentially to the blind technique.

Diagnostic imaging

Portable diagnostic imaging equipment can produce images of excellent quality in ambulatory settings. Advanced imaging modalities may be required to reach a diagnosis; for example, when the findings of conventional imaging (radiography and ultrasonography) do not fully explain the clinical picture, or when high-quality images cannot be obtained for the region of interest (for example, for ultrasonography of the foot, or of the distal limb of horses with thick skin).

Comparison between advanced and conventional imaging modalities, and the assessment of additional projections or techniques, has increased our understanding of radiological and ultrasonographic findings. The ever-increasing availability of advanced imaging modalities has not superseded conventional imaging modalities, but cemented their place in lameness investigation. One recent study compared ultrasonography and low-field MRI for the identification of lesions of the oblique (OSL) and straight sesamoidean ligaments (SSL; Hawkins et al, 2022). Ultrasonographic abnormalities were identified in 35 out of 42 cases (83% combined; 94% for SSL and 77% for OSL). Ultrasonography was limited by the presence of thick skin and resulting poor-quality images in 4 out of 42 cases, and in 3 out of 24 cases, no ultrasonographic abnormalities were detected.

The results of this study are in contrast to two previous studies, which reported an ultrasonographic detection rate of only 7% and 20% (Sampson et al, 2007 and Smith et al, 2008, respectively).

The discrepancy may reflect a difference in referral population or ultrasonographic technique. Although Doppler ultrasonography was performed in the recent study by Hawkins et al (2022), in contrast to the studies by Sampson et al (2007) and Smith et al (2008), the role this additional technique played in the diagnosis of desmitis of the OSLs or SSL is not clear. Ultrasonographic evaluation is a valuable tool for soft-tissue assessment, but does rely on the acquisition of high-quality images, in planes that are optimised to the structure of interest.

The diagnostic accuracy of radiography for the identification of synovial involvement in 216 horses with traumatic limb injuries was recently retrospectively assessed using synovial fluid cytology as the gold standard for comparison (Michotte et al, 2022).

A moderate sensitivity (61%) and high specificity (81%) indicate that radiography should be interpreted with caution. The high likelihood of a false-negative result makes it an unacceptable diagnostic tool for determining the likelihood of synovial involvement in trauma cases.

References

  • Bellitto N et al (2022a). Comparison of ultrasound guided versus “blind” tibial perineural analgesia in lameness investigation of the horse, Equine Vet J 54(s57): 8.
  • Bellitto N et al (2022b). Validation of skin sensation as an indicator of tibial nerve desensitisation following diagnostic perineural analgesia in lameness investigation, Equine Vet J 54(s57): 7-8.
  • Berger J et al (2022). Commentary on Ladewig et al: the uses, values, and limitations of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram, J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 57(S53).
  • Dyson S et al (2018a). Development of an ethogram for a pain scoring system in ridden horses and its application to determine the presence of musculoskeletal pain, J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 23: 47-57.
  • Dyson S et al (2018b). Behavioural observations and comparisons of non-lame horses and lame horses before and after resolution of lameness by diagnostic analgesia, J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 26: 64-70.
  • Dyson S (2020). How to determine the presence of musculoskeletal pain in ridden horses by application of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram, Proc Amer Assoc Equine Pract 66: 334-342.
  • Dyson S et al (2020). Can veterinarians reliably apply a whole horse ridden ethogram to differentiate non-lame and lame horses based on live horse assessment of behaviour? Equine Vet Educ 32(S10): 112-120.
  • Dyson S and Van Dijk J (2020). Application of a ridden horse ethogram to video recordings of 21 horses before and after diagnostic analgesia: reduction in behaviour scores, Equine Vet Educ 32(S10): 104-111.
  • Equitopia (2019) How to recognize the 24 behaviors indicating pain in the ridden horse, bit.ly/3m7fFkN
  • Gough MR et al (2002). Diffusion of mepivacaine between adjacent synovial structures in the horse. Part 1: forelimb foot and carpus, Equine Vet J 34(1): 80-84.
  • Greve L and Dyson S (2014). The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip and back shape in the general sports horse population, Equine Vet J 46(6): 687-694.
  • Hammarberg M et al (2016). Rater agreement of visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing, Equine Vet J 48(1): 78-82.
  • Hardeman AM et al (2022). Visual lameness assessment in comparison to quantitative gait analysis data in horses, Equine Vet J 54(6): 1,076-1,085.
  • Harper J et al (2007). Effects of analgesia of the distal flexor tendon sheath on pain originating in the sole, distal interphalangeal joint or navicular bursa of horses, Equine Vet J 39(6): 535-539.
  • Hawkins A et al (2022). Retrospective analysis of oblique and straight distal sesamoidean ligament desmitis in 52 horses, Equine Vet J 54(2): 312-322.
  • Miagkoff L and Bonilla AG (2021). Desensitisation of the distal forelimb following intrathecal anaesthesia of the carpal sheath in horses, Equine Vet J 53(1): 167-176.
  • Michotte M et al (2022) Diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography to identify synovial penetration in horses with traumatic limb wounds, Equine Vet J 54(S57): 12-13.
  • Nagy A et al (2010). Distribution of radiodense contrast medium after perineural injection of the palmar and palmar metacarpal nerves (low 4-point nerve block): an in vivo and ex vivo study in horses, Equine Vet Educ 42(6): 512-518.
  • Nagy A et al (2012). Diffusion of contrast medium after four different techniques for analgesia of the proximal metacarpal region: an in vivo and ex vivo study, Equine Vet Educ 44(6): 668-673.
  • Nagy A and Malton R (2015). Diffusion of radiodense contrast medium after perineural injection of the palmar digital nerves, Equine Vet Educ 27(12): 648-654.
  • Pfau T and Weller R (2017). Comparison of a standalone consumer grade smartphone with a specialist inertial measurement unit for quantification of movement symmetry in the trotting horse, Equine Vet J 49(1): 124-129.
  • Pilsworth R and Dyson S (2015). Where does it hurt? Problems with interpretation of regional and intra-synovial diagnostic analgesia, Equine Vet Educ 27(11): 595-603.
  • Radtke A et al (2020). Intra-articular anaesthesia of the equine stifle improved foot lameness, Equine Vet J 52(2): 314-319.
  • Sampson SN et al (2007). Magnetic resonance imaging features of oblique and straight distal sesamoidean desmitis in 27 horses, Vet Radiol Ultrasound 48(4): 303-311.
  • Serra Bragança FM et al (2018) Quantification of the effect of instrumentation error in objective gait assessment in the horse on hindlimb symmetry parameters, Equine Vet J 50(3): 370-376.
  • Smith S et al (2008). Magnetic resonance imaging of distal sesamoidean ligament injury, Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49(6): 516-528.