Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • Vet Times jobs home
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital Edition

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

OverviewSymptomsDiagnosisTreatmentReferences

1 Jul 2013

TREATMENT OF HINDLIMB PROXIMAL SUSPENSORY DESMITIS IN HORSES

author_img

Shelley Down

Job Title



TREATMENT OF HINDLIMB PROXIMAL SUSPENSORY DESMITIS IN HORSES

SHELLEY DOWN considers diagnostic methods for this ligament injury prevalent in performance horses, and treatment choices, including surgery

Summary

Proximal suspensory desmitis (PSD) is usually diagnosed using local analgesic techniques in combination with ultrasonography and radiography. Scintigraphic examination is useful for assessing osseous pathology. MRI may be required in some cases. Hindlimb PSD is a difficult condition to manage, and is associated with a poor prognosis with rest alone. Intervention, such as surgery, is often therefore warranted.

Key words

horse, suspensory ligament, desmitis, neurectomy and fasciotomy

PROXIMAL suspensory desmitis (PSD) is a well recognised cause of lameness1,2.

The proximal aspect of the hindlimb suspensory ligament (SL) is defined as the region 2cm to 10cm distal to the tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ)2. In the hindlimb, the SL originates from the proximoplantar aspect of the third metatarsal bone (MTIII); there is a proximally extending band originating on the plantar aspect of the fourth tarsal bone.

The function of the SL is to prevent overextension of the metatarsophalangeal joint3. Innervation is via the plantar metatarsal nerves – branches of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve (DBLPN), which is a branch of the lateral plantar nerve, derived from the tibial nerve.

Horses present with lameness or poor performance (unwilling to go forward, reduced hindlimb impulsion, evasive behaviour, reduced power when jumping, refusing fences). PSD is a common condition in all types of horses1,4; dressage and jumping horses are particularly prone5,6. Pain causing lameness may originate from the SL itself or be associated with compression of the adjacent nerves7.

Clinical examination

There are frequently no localising clinical signs4, reflecting the often chronic nature of the injury. It is not possible to palpate the proximal suspensory ligament (PSL) because of the position between the second and fourth metatarsal bones. In acute injury, distension of the medial plantar vein, localised pain8 and oedema are sometimes found.

PSD is often accompanied by mediolateral foot imbalance9,10. Hindlimb PSD may result in secondary back pain, including development of pain from pre-existing dorsal spinous processes4.

Horses with metatarsophalangeal hyperextension or straight hock conformation (Figure 1) are predisposed1,11, as are those with long toes and low heels2. Metatarsophalangeal hyperextension is found in breeds such as the Peruvian paso12,13 and in old brood mares14, which may indicate age-related degeneration.

A positive response to both distal and proximal limb flexion is not unusual1,4. Many horses present with lameness most evident when the affected limb is on the outside of the circle on a soft surface. However, there is no pathognomonic gait abnormality10 or pattern in lameness for hindlimb PSD4.

Analgesia

Ultrasonographic and radiographic changes are sometimes subtle, resulting in heavy reliance on diagnostic analgesia for diagnosis. Pain resulting from PSD can be partially improved with “low-4(6)-point” analgesia4 probably due to proximal diffusion of local anaesthetic solution.

Proximal suspensory ligament desensitisation can be achieved by analgesia of the proximal medial and lateral metatarsal nerves15, tibial nerve8, DBLPN using a nerve block (DBLPnb)16, and local infiltration15. The author uses the DBLPnb due to its simplicity and option of neurectomy if response is marked. There is also a reduced chance of inadvertent entry into the TMTJ and tarsal sheath16.

If the response is unclear, it is useful to perform tibial nerve analgesia, which alleviates PSL pain without significantly influencing tarsal pain4.

There has been evidence of DBLPnb causing desensitisation of the lateral heel bulb to the distal aspect of the fourth metatarsal bone on the plantarolateral aspect of the limb, indicating analgesia of the lateral plantar and plantar metatarsal nerves16. It is, therefore, advisable that analgesia of the distal aspect of the limb be undertaken first.

When there is a significant response (greater than or equal to 75 per cent) to DBLPnb, the author undertakes TMTJ analgesia on a separate occasion due to the possible inadvertent entrance of the TMTJ plantar pouch17, and results compared. If there is a positive but less than 75 per cent improvement following DBLPnb, then TMTJ analgesia and/or infiltration of the proximoplantar MTIII region can be added to assess any coexistence of distal tarsal or proximal MTIII entheseous pain and PSD respectively.

Bilateral DBLPnb can be undertaken in horses with poor hindlimb impulsion. Analgesia of one limb in these cases may not result in visible lameness in the contralateral limb, as would be expected4; yet bilateral analgesia can result in marked ridden improvement.

Fiagnostic imaging

– Ultrasonography

For ultrasonography of the PSL, the limb must be approached from the plantaromedial aspect18. The plantar aspect of MTIII must be visualised to ensure SL changes are not artefactual. The size of this “window” can be narrow, affecting image quality. Due to the depth of the ligament and position between the second and fourth metatarsal bones, the medial and lateral margins are not always appreciable. Use of a convex-array transducer, “virtual convex” application or “stand-off” pad may alleviate these problems. Pathology seen on ultrasonography may include enlargement (Figure 2), poor margin definition, loss of fibre pattern (Figure 3), areas of hypoechogenicity, both centrally (Figure 4) and peripherally (Figure 5), hyperechogenic foci (Figure 3), short fibre pattern on longitudinal images (Figure 2 and 3) and MTIII plantar cortex irregularity (Figure 2).

Analgesic techniques can cause air artefacts. Because of this it is advisable to leave 24 hours between analgesia and ultrasonography. Presence of muscular tissue and shadowing artefacts10 resulting from fluidfilled structures (such as blood vessels) and round structures (such as overlying flexor tendons19) may also complicate interpretation. Longitudinal images highlight short fibre pattern and may be more sensitive than radiography at detecting plantar MTIII pathology20.

Increased proximal cross sectional area (greater than 1.5cm2) of the PSL has been recorded21, but obliquity causes inaccuracy in measurements. With unilateral lameness it is useful to compare with the contralateral limb. A study comparing SL measurements (cross sectional area, width and thickness) using ultrasonography, MRI and histology found ultrasonography had poor accuracy for cross sectional area measurement compared to MRI and histology22,23. Zauscher et al24 has also found poor intra and interobserver agreement for measurement of PSL width, cross-sectional area and circumference. Reduction in space between the SL and the plantar MTIII cortex may be useful subjectively to represent SL enlargement4 (Figure 5).

– Radiography

Radiography may reveal endosteal new bone on the dorsal aspect of the plantar cortex of MTIII (Figures 6 and 7) or entheseous new bone on the proximal aspect of MT111. This may indicate chronicity, possibly with subclinical injury prior to detectable lameness/poor performance8. It must be noted, however, that increased radiopacity of the proximal aspect of MTIII (Figure 8) can be present in sound horses4,25 and so should be interpreted with care. Radiology may underestimate the presence of new bone, which may be more reliably detected using computed tomograph26 or MRI27,28.

– Scintigraphy

Scintigraphy may determine if there is active pathology at the origin of the SL, which is not evident radiographically20. This is especially important if ultrasonographic changes do not fit the degree of lameness. Analgesia of the DBLPN may result in diffusion of local anaesthetic solution to the proximal aspect of MTIII. In the absence of ultrasonographic abnormality, scintigraphic examination may help to define active osseous lesions as the principal cause of pain, altering prognosis and treatment. Lack of increased radiopharmaceutical uptake (IRU) is a common finding with PSD unless there is an avulsion injury29. In a study of 126 horses, only 12 per cent with hindlimb PSD had IRU identified subjectively in bone phase images20.

– Magnetic resonance imaging

If there is a positive response to analgesia, but ultrasonography is negative or equivocal, MRI should be undertaken of the distal hock and proximal metatarsal regions27,28,30. Some horses with osseous injury at the origin of the suspensory ligament where lameness is abolished following DBLPnb, have only been noted on MRI27.

Treatment

Horses with hindlimb PSD respond poorly to rest alone1,31, although horses with loss of support to the metatarsophalangeal joint need long-term rest regardless of therapy6. Only 6/42 (14 per cent) of horses were able to resume work without lameness for a year, all of which had presented with lameness less than five weeks in duration1.

The PSL and distal DBLPN are confined between the second, third and fourth metatarsal bones and the deep laminar plantar metatarsal fascia. PSD is theorised to result in compartment syndrome and neural compression in some horses7,11,32. Abnormal innervation can follow SL injury, resulting in chronic pain31.

Treatments for PSD include radial pressure wave therapy. Forty-one per cent of 43 horses with hindlimb PSD and lameness greater than or equal to three months’ duration returned to full work six months after this treatment33. Focused shockwave therapy has achieved similar results34,35. Desmoplasty and fasciotomy for core injuries resulted in 87 per cent of 23 horses resuming work36. Bioscaffold therapy (A-Cell) in combination with fasciotomy resulted in 84 per cent of 77 horses with fore or hindlimb PSD returning to full work37. The two latter studies had a poorly defined follow-up period. Stem cell therapy38 and osteostixis undertaken when there is concurrent osseous pathology of the proximoplantar aspect of MTIII39,40 has also been used. Stem cell therapy (and bioscaffold treatment) may be an advantageous treatment for return of SL structure, but may not alleviate pain and lameness as the result of neural compression and compartment syndrome40. Such treatments may be useful in conjunction with neurectomy and fasciotomy to improve ultrasonographic fibre pattern, which is often not achieved following this surgery. Use of bisphosphonates has also been reported as being useful in horses with enthesis-related pain41. Tibial neurectomy has been used as a treatment for PSD with 6/8 horses (75 per cent) returning to full athletic function for at least two years post-surgery2. Neurectomy of the DBLPN and fasciotomy in combination7,31,42 has resulted in success rates between 62 per cent and 91 per cent, with good long-term follow-up (greater than one year postoperatively43) and no loss of sensation or proprioceptive deficits44.

In most cases, the author recommends treatment of PSD with a neurectomy and fasciotomy if there is a diagnosis of primary PSD causing pain and lameness, significant response to DBLPnb (greater than or equal to 75 per cent) and SL enlargement probably leading to compartment syndrome and neural compression.

Lameness and response to analgesic techniques is sometimes only seen unilaterally. Some horses become lame on the contralateral limb after treatment such as surgery when strenuous exercise resumes7.

A histopathology study of the DBLPNs of 16 PSD cases that underwent neurectomy found myxomatous expansion with Renault bodies in the subperineurium and nerve fascicles, and axonal degeneration.

This was also found in non-lame limbs if surgery was undertaken bilaterally7. In the non-lame limb these findings may indicate the presence of neural compression caused by an enlarged SL. Therefore it may be of benefit to undertake surgery in the non-lame contralateral limb if there are any ultrasonographic abnormalities.

Success of neurectomy and fasciotomy can be assessed four to eight weeks following surgery7. Continued lameness at this point carries a guarded prognosis.

Ultrasonographic improvement often lags behind clinical improvement because structural improvement requires greater time. Ideally, ultrasonographic improvement is gained before any increase in exercise, regardless of clinical improvement. In some cases there is no ultrasonographic improvement, despite soundness. Reduction in cross-sectional area is often seen, which may be resolution of desmitis, or the result of neurogenic atrophy of the SL muscular tissue45. Painful neuromas did not occur in a study involving more than 250 horses31, suggesting a reduced risk compared with palmar digital neurectomy46.

Farriery should also be addressed, such as reducing the dorsal hoof wall angle. This decreases the break-over reducing the requirement for limb flexion and decreases strain within the suspensory ligament47. Mediolateral foot imbalance should be addressed to prevent further PSL aggravation.

Hyperextension of the metatarsophalangeal joint can be a sequel to PSD, especially in horses that appear to have progressive degeneration of the SL4. In these horses, the SL may continually degenerate despite surgery. Horses with hyperextension of the metatarsophalangeal joint and straight hock conformation are at greater risk of surgical failure43, lameness reoccurrence, SL deterioration and SL breakdown and should not be candidates for neurectomy and fasciotomy. Horses that undergo surgery for PSD with concurrent local pathology have a reduced prognosis for return to full athletic function43. Surgical cases should be chosen appropriately and owners advised accordingly.

Concurrent tarsal pain is reported with PSD48. Surgical management of horses with PSL and tarsal pain may improve the overall prognosis. The accessory ligament of the SL originates on the plantar aspect of the calcaneous and fourth tarsal bone and merges with the SL in the proximal metatarsal region49. As neurogenic atrophy of the muscular tissue within the SL may occur following neurectomy, it is possible the biomechanics of the distal hock joints may be altered, which may predispose to the development of distal hock joint pain43.

References

  • 1. Dyson S (1994). Proximal suspensory desmitis in the hindlimb: 42 cases, Br Vet J 150: 279-291.
  • 2. Dyson S and Genovese R (2003). The suspensory apparatus. In M W Ross and S J Dyson (eds), Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse (1st edn), W B Saunders Co, Philadelphia: 362-376.
  • 3. Gibson K T and Steel C M (2002). Conditions of the suspensory ligament causing lameness in horses, Equine Vet Educ 14: 39-50.
  • 4. Dyson S (2007). Diagnosis and management of common suspensory lesions in the forelimbs and hindlimbs of sports horses, Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 179-188.
  • 5. Murray R, Dyson S, Tranquille C and Adams V (2006). Association of type of sport and performance level with anatomical site of orthopaedic injury and injury diagnosis, Equine Vet J 36 (Suppl): 411-416.
  • 6. Ross M W (2006). Suspensory desmitis-management options, Proceedings The North American Veterinary Conference, Orlando, Florida 20: 198-200.
  • 7. Tóth F, Schumacher J, Schramme M, Holder T, Adair H S and Donnell R L (2008). Compressive damage to the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve associated with lameness caused by proximal suspensory desmitis, Vet Surg 37: 328-335.
  • 8. Dyson S (1991). Proximal suspensory desmitis: clinical, ultrasonographic and radiographic features, Equine Vet J 23: 25-31.
  • 9. Nixon A J (1990). Suspensory desmitis. In White N A and Moore J N (eds), Current Practice of Equine Surgery , J B Lippincott Company, Philadelphia: 448-451.
  • 10. Dyson S (1996). Diagnosis and prognosis of suspensory desmitis, Proceedings Dubai International Equine Symposium, Dubai : 207-225.
  • 11. Dyson S J (2003). Proximal metacarpal and metatarsal pain: a diagnostic challenge, Equine Vet Educ 3: 134-138.
  • 12. Mero J M and Pool R R (2002). Twenty cases of degenerative suspensory ligament desmitis in Peruvian Paso horses, Proceedings Am Ass Equine Pract Orlando, Florida 48: 329-334.
  • 13. Mero J M and Scarlett J M (2005). Diagnostic criteria for degenerative suspensory ligament desmitis in Peruvian paso horses, J Equine Vet Sci 224-228.
  • 14. Martin B B and McDonnell S M (2003). Lameness in breeding stallions and broodmares. In M W Ross and S J Dyson (eds), Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse (1st edn), W B Saunders Co, Philadelphia: 1,077-1,084.
  • 15. Brassage L H and Ross M W (2003). Diagnostic analgesia. In M W Ross and S J Dyson (eds), Diag nosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse (1st edn). W B Saunders Co, Philadelphia: 93-124.
  • 16. Hughes T K, Eliashar E and Smith R (2007). In vitro evaluation of a single injection technique for diagnostic analgesia of the proximal suspensory ligament of the equine pelvic limb, Vet Surg 36: 760-764.
  • 17. Dyson S and Romero J (1993). An investigation for local analgesia of the equine distal tarsus and proximal metatarsus, Equine Vet J 25: 30-35.
  • 18. Dyson S (1998). The suspensory apparatus. In Rantanen N and McKinnon A (eds), Equine Diagnostic Ultrasonography (1st edn), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore: 447-474.
  • 19. Kirbeger R (1995). Imaging artefacts in diagnostic ultrasound – a review, Vet Radiol and Ultrasound 36: 297-306.
  • 20. Dyson S J, Weekes J and Murray R (2007). Scintigraphic evaluation of the proximal metacarpal and metatarsal regions of horses with proximal suspensory desmitis, Vet Radiol and Ultrasound 48: 78-85.
  • 21. Reef V B (1998). Musculoskeletal ultrasonography. In Reef V B (ed), Equine Diagnostic Ultrasound (1st edn), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA: 61.
  • 22. Bischofberger A S, Konar M, Ohlerth S, Geyer H, Lang J, Ueltschi G and Lischer C J (2006). Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and histology of the suspensory ligament origin: a comparative study of normal anatomy of warmblood horses, Equine Vet J 38: 508-516.
  • 23. Schamme M, Josson A and Linder K (2012). Characterisation of the origin and body of the normal equine rear suspensory ligament using ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and histology, Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 318-328.
  • 24. Zauscher J M, Estrada R, Edinger J and Lischer C J (2013). The proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament in the horse: how precise are ultrasonographic measurements? Equine Vet J 45: 164-169.
  • 25. Butler A, Colles C M, Dyson S J, Kold S E and Poulos P W (2008). The metacarpal and metatarsal regions. In Clinical Radiology of the Horse (3rd edn), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford: 189-232.
  • 26. Launois M, Vanderweerd J, Perrin R, Brogniez L, Desbrosse F and Clegg P (2009). Use of computed tomography to diagnose new bone formation associated with desmitis of the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament in third metacarpal or third metatarsal bones of three horses, J Am Vet Med Ass 234: 514-518.
  • 27. Labans R, Schamme M C, Robertson I D, Thrall D E and Redding W R (2010). Clinical, magnetic resonance and sonographic findings in horses with proximal plantar metatarsal pain, Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 11-18.
  • 28. Brokken M and Tucker R (2011). The metacarpal/metatarsal region. In R Murray (ed), Equine MRI (1st edn), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford: 361-383.
  • 29. Edwards R B, Ducharme N G, Fubini S L, Yeager A E and Kallfelz F A (1995). Scintigraphy for diagnosis of avulsion of the origin of the suspensory ligament in horses: 51 cases (1980-1993), J Am Vet Med Assoc 207: 608-611.
  • 30. Werpy N (2011). Low-field MRI in horses: practicalities and image acquisition. In Murray R (ed), Equine MRI (1st edn), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford: 75-79.
  • 31. Bathe A P (2006a). Plantar metatarsal neurectomy and fasci otomy for the treatment of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmitis, Proceedings of the 45th British Equine Vet Congress, Birmingham, UK : 198-199.
  • 32. Dyson S (1995). Problems Encountered in Equine Lameness Diagnosis, with Special Reference to Local Analgesic Techniques, Radiology and Ultrasonography (PhD thesis), University of Helsinki. R and W Publications, Newmarket, England: 31-54.
  • 33. Crowe O, Dyson S, Wright I, Shramme M and Smith R (2004). Treatment of chronic or recurrent proximal suspensory desmitis using radial pressure wave therapy, Equine Vet J 36: 313-316.
  • 34. Boening J, Liffield S and Matuschek S (2000). Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic insertion desmopathy of the proximal suspensory ligament, Proceedings Am Ass Equine Practnrs 46: 203-207.
  • 35. Lischer C, Ringer S, Schnewlin M, Inbodeb I, Rierst A, Stocckli M and Auer J (2006). Treatment of chronic proximal suspensory ligament desmitis in horses using focussed electrohydraulic shockwave therapy, Schweizer Arch Tierheilk 148: 561-568.
  • 36. Hewes C A and White N A (2006). Outcome of desmoplasty and fasciotomy for desmitis involving the origin of the suspensory ligament in horses: 27 cases (1995– 2004), J Am Vet Med Assoc 3: 407-412.
  • 37. Mitchell R (2006). Treatment of tendon and ligament injuries with UBM powder, Proceedings of Conference on Equine Sports Medicine and Science, Cambridge, UK : 213-218.
  • 38. Herthel D J (2001). Enhanced suspensory ligament healing in 100 horses by stem cell and other bone marrow components, AAEP Proceedings 47: 319-21.
  • 39. Lanois T, Desbrosse F and Perrin R (2003). Percutaneous osteostixis as a treatment for avulsion fractures of the palmar/plantar third metacarpal/ metatarsal bone cortex at the origin of the suspensory ligament in 29 cases, Equine Vet Educ 15: 126-138.
  • 40. Bathe A (2006b). Management of proximal suspensory desmitis. In Management of Lameness Causes in Sport Horses: Muscle, Tendon, Joint and Bone Disorders , Conference on Equine Sports Medicine and Science, Cambridge, UK. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands: 53-57.
  • 41. Bathe A P (2006c). Treatment of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmitis, Pferdeheilkunde 22: 670-672.
  • 42. Kelly G (2007). Results of neurectomy of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve for treatment of proximal suspensory desmitis, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Convention of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons, Dublin : 130.
  • 43. Dyson S and Murray R (2012). Management of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmopathy by neurectomy and deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve and plantar fasciotomy: 155 horses (2003-2008), Equine Vet J 44: 361-367.
  • 44. Bathe A (2001). Neurectomy and fasciotomy for surgical treatment of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmitis, Proceedings 40th British Equine Vet Congress, Harrogate, UK : 118.
  • 45. Kaneps A J (2007). Surgical options for treating tendon and ligament injuries, Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 209-216.
  • 46. Madison B and Dyson S J (2003). Treatment and prognosis of horses with navicular disease. In Ross M W and Dyson S J (eds) Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse (1st edn), W B Saunders Co, Philadelphia: 299-304.
  • 47. Keegan K G, Baker G J, Boero M J and Pijanowski G J (1991). Measurement of suspensory ligament strain using a liquid mercury strain gauge: evaluation of strain reduction by support bandaging and alteration of hoof wall angle, Proceedings Am Ass Equine Pract, San Francisco, California 37: 243-244.
  • 48. Dyson S (2006). Diagnosis of proximal suspensory desmitis in the forelimb and hindlimb. In Management of Lameness Causes in Sport Horses: Muscle, Tendon, Joint and Bone Disorders . Conference on Equine Sports Medicine and Science, Cambridge, UK. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  • 49. Schulze T and Budras K-D (2008). Zur klinisch-funktionellen Anatomie des M. Interosseous medius der Hintergliedmabe im Hinblik auf die Insertiondesmopathie des Pferdes-kernspin-, computeromographische-und-morphologische Untersuchugen, Pferdeheilkunde 24: 343-350.

Figure 1.The hindlimbs of a four-year-old warmblood potential event horse. Note marked straight hock conformation. This horse had bilateral hindlimb proximal suspensory desmitis. This is an example of a poor candidate for surgical intervention with a plantar neurectomy and fasciotomy.

Figure 2. Longitudinal ultrasonographic image of the right proximal metatarsal region of a five-year-old, warmblood, dressage horse. Proximal is to the left. There is a convex contour of the plantar aspect of the SL reflecting swelling (red arrows), loss of long fibre pattern (white arrow) and mildly irregular bone (green arrow) at the origin of the suspensory ligament.

Figure 3. Longitudinal ultrasonographic image of the right proximal metatarsal region of a nine-year-old, working hunter pony at Zones 1A and 1A/1B. Proximal is to the left. Note loss of long fibre pattern in the dorsal aspect of the suspensory ligament (yellow arrows). There are also hyperechogenic foci (red arrows), most likely indicating chronicity.

Figure 4 (left). Transverse ultrasonographic image of the proximal aspect of the right suspensory ligament, four centimetres distal to the tarsometatarsal joint in the same pony as in Figure 3. Medial is to the left. Note the large acentric hypoechogenic core-type lesion (yellow arrow).

Figure 5 (right). Transverse ultrasonographic image of the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament, four centimetres distal to the left tarsometatarsal joint in an 16-year-old, grade A, warmblood, showjumper gelding. Medial is to the left. There is no space between the plantar aspect of the third metatarsal bone and the suspensory ligament, and the ligament is subjectively markedly enlarged. There is poor fibre pattern of the ligament with three large hypoechogenic areas (yellow arrows).

Figure 6 (far left). Lateromedial radiographic image of the right proximal metatarsal region of the same pony as in Figure 3. Dorsal is to the left. There is endosteal new bone on the dorsal aspect of the plantar cortex of the third metatarsal bone (yellow arrows).

Figure 7 (centre). Lateromedial radiographic image of the right proximal metatarsal region of an eight-yearold, thoroughbred-cross horse used for general purpose. Dorsal is to the left. There is sclerosis (yellow arrows) and increased radiopacity and alteration of trabecular architecture (red arrows) of the proximoplantar aspect of the third metatarsal bone.

Figure 8 (right). Dorsoplantar radiographic image of the right proximal metatarsal region of the same pony as in Figure 3. Medial is to the left. There is increased opacity (yellow arrow) of the axial aspect of the third metatarsal bone. This can be a normal finding in clinically sound horses. There is alteration in trabecular pattern (red arrow) in the region of the origin of the suspensory ligament.

Meet the authors

author_img

Shelley Down

Job Title