‌

Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • Vet Times jobs home
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital Edition

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

22 Apr 2025

Novel tool to help reduction of parasiticide use in cattle launches

author_img

Jenny Allan

Job Title



Novel tool to help reduction of parasiticide use in cattle launches

Image: Clara / Adobe Stock

Parasite control measures have traditionally been dominated by the routine, continuous use of parasiticides in the cattle sector – particularly youngstock.

Common examples include treating cattle on a four-week to six-week schedule throughout the grazing season or, in more recent years, by using prolonged release “seasonal control” products.

However, product residues in the environment, development of parasiticide resistance and lack of natural immunity are becoming concerns from the use of these products.

Integrated parasite management

Integrated parasite management (IPM) describes a package of preventive measures such as vaccination, diagnostics and pasture management aimed at reducing livestock exposure to parasite contaminated pasture. These measures aim to reduce the amount of parasiticides needed through a grazing season.

Parasiticide residues excreted can harm the invertebrate life that inhabits dung1,2. When livestock are treated with parasiticide, the residue from these are excreted via the faeces.

Invertebrates – particularly dung beetles which normally inhabit dung pats within a few hours – are especially vulnerable, affecting species diversity and functional reproduction2-5.

Invertebrates are vital in maintaining soil health, with dung beetles being a keystone species in the soil ecosystem. Sixty species of dung beetle are present in the UK and approximately 50% are nationally scarce or threatened6; one study estimated them to be worth £367 million in services to topsoil7. Dung beetles recycle organic matter from faeces into the top soil layer, aid water retention, aerate the soil, provide a vital food source8,9, reduce nuisance fly breeding sites and lower methane emissions10,11. Recent emerging reports exist of residues of parasiticides being found in groundwater supplies12, potentially leading to concerns about human health impacts, too.

Parasiticides in rivers have also come under the spotlight13, and some ivermectin-based products found in waterways are remaining harmful for longer than originally thought14,15. As it stands, little UK-based research exists around the impact of livestock parasiticides products on waterways16,17; however, this research area is rapidly evolving.

At The Dung Beetle Conference held at Yeo Valley in June 2024, monitoring parasiticides was one of the agreed “actions needed” discussed in workshops, attended by many sector representatives from the livestock industry. The Pesticide Collaboration report that has assisted development of government targets also highlights the need for measuring usage18.

The ability to measure and monitor parasiticide usage data over time will support the drive to encourage targeted treatment protocols to ensure the long-term sustainability of these parasiticide products. From 2014 to 2019, the UK livestock industry reduced its antibiotic use by 50%, greatly facilitated by the University of Nottingham’s antibiotic calculator19. Until now, no such tool has been available for parasiticides.

Jenny Allan at Herd Health Consultancy and Rob Howe collaborated to design and develop a methodology and tool to enable parasiticide products used in cattle to be objectively measured and benchmarked.

The tool focuses not only on amount of parasiticide used, but also how the other key IPM areas being implemented. It enables recognition of good practice and evidence-based decision making related to prevention, monitoring and treatment. This encourages adoption of best-practice targeted parasiticide use while minimising the risk of knee-jerk cessation of treatment, which is important for promoting good animal welfare and productivity.

The tool is formulated of two sections: question-based review focusing on decision making and calculations including two novel metrics to measure the amount of parasiticide used.

It is important that all three elements of IPM were represented to create a holistic method, enabling producers and veterinary professionals to identify weaker areas in preventive actions or highlight where some additional diagnostics are needed, all working towards appropriate reduction in parasiticide use where opportunities exist.

Presentation

The tool was presented at BCVA Congress on 18 October 2024, with a full paper on the methodology to be published in the near future.

Overall, availability of parasiticide use data would initiate the drive for change and reduction.

This area is fast becoming a priority for multiple supply chain stakeholders, and this tool will provide a starting point to gather data to understand and reduce usage of parasiticides in livestock.

The tool has been developed by:

  • Jenny Allan, Herd Health Consultancy
  • Rob Howe, COWS and BCVA board member
  • Nick Bell, director of Herd Health Consultancy

 

  • This article was in Vet Times (2025), Volume 55, Issue 16, Page 20

References

  • 1. Finch D, Schofield H, Floate KD, Kubasiewicz LM and Mathews F (2020). Implications of endectocide residues on the survival of aphodiine dung beetles: a meta-analysis, Environ Toxicol Chem 39(4): 863-872.
  • 2. Sands B and Wall R (2018). Sustained parasiticide use in cattle farming affects dung beetle functional assemblages, Agric Ecosyst Environ 265: 226-235.
  • 3. de Souza RB, Guimarães JR (2022). Effects of avermectins on the environment based on its toxicity to plants and soil invertebrates – a review, Water Air Soil Pollut 233(7): 259.
  • 4. Jacobs CT and Scholtz CH (2015). A review on the effect of macrocyclic lactones on dung-dwelling insects: toxicity of macrocyclic lactones to dung beetles, Onderstepoort J Vet Res 82(1): 858.
  • 5. Manning P, Lewis OT and Beynon SA (2018). Effects of the veterinary anthelmintic moxidectin on dung beetle survival and dung removal, Entomol Exp Appl 166(10): 810-817.
  • 6. Lane S and Mann D (2016). A review of the status of the beetles of Great Britain: the stag beetles, dor beetles, dung beetles, chafers and their allies – Lucanidae, Geotrupidae, Trogidae and Scarabaeidae: species status No.31, Natural England, available at https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/5488450394914816
  • 7. Beynon SA, Wainwright WA and Christie M (2015). The application of an ecosystem services framework to estimate the economic value of dung beetles to the U.K. cattle industry, Ecol Entomol 40(S1): 124–35.
  • 8. Gilbert G, MacGillivray FS, Robertson HL and Jonsson NN (2019). Adverse effects of routine bovine health treatments containing triclabendazole and synthetic pyrethroids on the abundance of dipteran larvae in bovine faeces, Sci Rep 9(1): 4,315.
  • 9. Dung Beetles for Farmers (2024). Dung Beetles for Farmers, available at https://www.dungbeetlesforfarmers.co.uk/
  • 10. Slade EM, Riutta T, Roslin T and Tuomisto HL (2016). The role of dung beetles in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cattle farming, Sci Rep 6: 18140.
  • 11. Penttilä A, Slade EM, Simojoki A, Riutta T, Minkkinen K and Roslin T (2013). Quantifying beetle-mediated effects on gas fluxes from dung pats, PLoS One 8(8): e71454.
  • 12. Mooney D, Richards KG, Danaher M, Grant J, Gill L, Mellander P et al (2021). An analysis of the spatio-temporal occurrence of anthelmintic veterinary drug residues in groundwater, Sci Total Environ 769: 144804.
  • 13. Perkins R, Whitehead M, Civil W and Goulson D (2021). Potential role of veterinary flea products in widespread pesticide contamination of English rivers, Sci Total Environ 755(Pt 1): 143560.
  • 14. Sanderson H, Laird B, Pope L, Brain R, Wilson C, Johnson D, et al (2007). Assessment of the environmental fate and effects of ivermectin in aquatic mesocosms, Aquat Toxicol 85(4): 229-240.
  • 15. Mesa L, Gutiérrez MF, Montalto L, Perez V and Lifschitz A (2020). Concentration and environmental fate of ivermectin in floodplain wetlands: an ecosystem approach, Sci Total Environ 706.
  • 16. Liebig M, Fernandez ÁA, Blübaum-Gronau E, Boxall A, Brinke M, Carbonell G, et al (2010). Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: a case study, Integr Environ Assess Manag 6(supp 1): 567–87.
  • 17. Beynon SA (2012). Potential environmental consequences of administration of ectoparasiticides to sheep, Vet Parasitol 189(1): 125-135.
  • 18. Tuncak B (2023). Designing pesticide reduction targets for the UK, The Pesticide Collaboration, available at https://pesticidecollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Reduction_targets_report_Jan2023.pdf
  • 19. The University of Nottingham School of Veterinary Medicine (2024). AHDB. Dairy Antimicrobial Usage (AMU) Calculator, available at https://ahdb.org.uk/amu-calculator
‌
‌
‌