‌

Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • Vet Times jobs home
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital Edition

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

OverviewSymptomsDiagnosisTreatmentReferences

23 Dec 2021

Spontaneous echo contrast in cardiac disease and IMHA

Mairi Frame, Viola Vannucci

Job Title



Spontaneous echo contrast in cardiac disease and IMHA

Image: © chanawit / Adobe Stock

It has been known for more than three decades in human medicine that spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) – described as dynamic swirling echoes within the cardiac chambers – is caused by an increased ultrasonographic back‑scatter due to red cell aggregation in conditions of blood stasis.

Its association with low-flow states known to predispose to thromboembolism, such as mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation, have led to the hypothesis that SEC may be a marker of increased thromboembolic risk1.

Left atrial (LA) SEC was initially imaged with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), but interest in it was renewed after the advent of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which improved the detection of LA SEC and LA thrombus (LAT).

The development of transthoracic harmonic imaging (THI) – a novel echocardiographic technique that differs from conventional fundamental imaging in that it involves transmitting ultrasound at one frequency and receiving at twice the transmitted frequency – has enhanced the detection of LA SEC.

The association between SEC and increased risk of thromboembolic events shows a similar specificity using THI compared to TEE2,3.

Fatkin et al (1995) found that severity of SEC, useful for classification of patients at thromboembolic risk, can be assessed reliably by experienced observers using a semiquantitative method of grading called videodensitometry4.

Although the mechanism for the development of SEC is not fully understood, an increase in blood viscosity at low shear rates has been hypothesised to cause SEC and favour development of thrombosis in most studies5.

LA SEC has been commonly detected in patients undergoing TEE suffering from conditions favouring blood stasis, such as atrial fibrillation, LA enlargement, mitral stenosis or mitral valve replacement.

Although the link between LA SEC and cardiovascular death is not straightforward, the overall incidence of thromboembolic events has been found to be higher in the presence of SEC, and data from several studies support a likely thromboembolic mechanism as a contributing factor for cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation6-10.

Sadanandan and Sherrid (2000) investigated the clinical significance of LA SEC in sinus rhythm and the results revealed that SEC occurred in patients with a significantly dilated left atrium and depressed atrial function. LAT was noted in 13 per cent of such patients and the presence of SEC was associated with a higher prevalence of cerebrovascular accident, indicating that LA SEC in sinus rhythm was a marker of prothrombotic condition11.

Significant cardiovascular and echocardiographic changes – including decreased systolic function and cardiac output, as well as the appearance of “new” valvular regurgitation and SEC – have been observed in healthy dogs sedated with dexmedetomidine.

The presence of SEC, in concert with otherwise normal echocardiographic findings, was interpreted as secondary to dexmedetomidine‑associated bradycardia; however, as SEC is considered suggestive of blood stasis and prothrombotic condition in presence of cardiac abnormalities, caution should be used when considering dexmedetomidine for sedation in patients with – or to be screened for – cardiovascular disease12.

SEC may be distributed throughout the main body of the LA, but it is usually more intense within the left auricular appendage.

It has been observed that severity of LA SEC was inversely related to blood flow velocity within the left auricular appendage and that the presence of mitral regurgitation was protective against SEC formation, but not against the risk for systemic thromboembolism.

It was hypothesised that turbulent flow produced by significant mitral regurgitation may increase blood share rate and, therefore, disrupt red cell aggregation13. However, Castello et al (1990) had different results in their study where 12 (48 per cent) of the 25 patients with LA SEC had mitral regurgitation, and the relative incidence of SEC in patients with significant mitral regurgitation was 28 per cent6.

Thromboembolism link

The pathogenesis of SEC and its association with thromboembolism is complex and multifactorial. The ability to identify patients at risk for thrombosis has become increasingly important to institute preventive measures and appropriate therapy.

Virchow’s triad of factors related to thrombogenesis includes decreased blood flow, changes in blood constituents leading to hypercoagulability, and vessel wall damage.

Hypercoagulability describes an imbalance of physiological haemostatic mechanisms that results in a tendency to favour clot formation14. Such imbalance can be caused by excess of coagulation factors (such as fibrinogen and factor VIII coagulant activity) and deficiency of inhibitors (such as antithrombin), and is characterised by an increase in products formed during thrombin generation or secondary to thrombin activity (such as fibrinopeptide A, thrombin-antithrombin complex and plasma fibrin D-dimer)15.

Haemostatic changes have been investigated as potential markers of thrombogenesis to identify high-risk patients for LAT and thromboembolic events.

It has been observed that plasmatic macromolecules – such as α-globulins and β-globulins, and fibrinogen – establish reversible bridges among red blood cells; therefore, they are required for the formation of erythrocytes aggregates13.

Data from some studies have shown an increase in von Willebrand factor and platelet factor IV – in particular β-thromboglobulin – in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm, with higher levels in the presence of enlarged LA and LAT, suggesting that endothelial damage and haemostatic activation are associated with the latter16,17.

Other studies found a significant increase in plasma fibrin D-dimer in patients with SEC and particularly with LAT. Wan et al (2017), in their systematic review and meta-analysis, found further evidence that D-dimer had moderate to high sensitivity and specificity in identifying the presence of LAT, therefore suggesting that a normal D-dimer value may indicate a low risk for the presence of this or thromboembolism18.

The platelet:lymphocyte ratio – known to be a marker of inflammation and prothrombotic state – has also been found to be independently associated with SEC in patients with mitral stenosis19.

Image: H_Ko / Adobe Stock ultrasound
Image: © H_Ko / Adobe Stock

Increasing recognition

Thrombosis is one of the main causes of death in critically ill people, and it is increasingly recognised as a cause of morbidity and mortality in veterinary medicine.

Mechanisms that contribute to hypercoagulability – and often result in a prothrombotic tendency – have been identified in several veterinary disorders such as, among others, cardiac disease and immune‑mediated haemolytic anaemia (IMHA)14.

Aortic thromboembolism (ATE) is a common, frequently fatal, sequel of cardiomyopathy in cats. A sub-analysis of a previously reported population of cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) – where those presented with congestive heart failure (CHF) or ATE had the shortest survival times – investigated risk factors for different causes of mortality, including CHF death, ATE death and sudden cardiac death. Results showed the most common cause of cardiac mortality was CHF (55.7 per cent), then ATE (29.1 per cent) and sudden death (15.2 per cent)20,21.

In cats and humans with cardiomyopathy, cardiac thrombi and SEC are observed most frequently in the left atrium and the LA appendage (LAA), and LAA flow velocity determined by TTE has been shown to be an independent factor in predicting SEC22.

In a retrospective study conducted by Peck et al (2016), the incidence and prognostic significance of SEC was evaluated in relation to cardiac disease and CHF in 725 cats. In this study, the presence of SEC was associated with an increased risk for death in cats with underlying acquired cardiac disease. Cats with HCM, dilated cardiomyopathy and unclassified cardiomyopathy were significantly more likely to develop SEC than other types of cardiac disease23.

Stokol et al (2008) reported on the risk of hypercoagulability associated with feline cardiomyopathy, based on an increase in at least two out of four parameters (fibrinogen, factor VIII coagulant activity, thrombin‑antithrombin complex, D-dimer). They found evidence of hypercoagulability in approximately 50 per cent of cats with ATE, and concurrent presence of SEC in 46 per cent of them24.

SEC is uncommonly reported in dogs. One case series reported the presence of SEC in the left ventricle or all the cardiac chambers of three dogs, which were diagnosed with infective mitral endocarditis, Evans syndrome and sepsis of unknown origin. These dogs had either normal cardiac size or mild cardiomegaly, but it was interestingly noted that all of them exhibited hyperfibrinogenaemia. However, a direct association between SEC and fibrinogen could not be established, likely due to the multifactorial pathophysiology of SEC25.

Trauma associated with abdominal surgery has also been reported to lead to the development of SEC in the caudal vena cava in healthy dogs. The authors of this study hypothesised that SEC was caused by systemic inflammation; however, no diagnostics were performed to investigate potential underlying hypercoagulability26.

Another case report described the development of SEC in the left ventricle of one dog, which occurred the day after occlusion of a previously diagnosed patent ductus arteriosus27. The dog experienced both hypotension and hypertension after ductal occlusion similarly to the dogs that exhibited SEC after sedation with dexmedetomidine reported by Kellihan et al (2015)12. The patient of this case report was discharged with clopidogrel, and five weeks later the previously documented SEC had resolved27.

Various coagulation abnormalities have also been documented in dogs with IMHA, including disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and hypercoagulable state, which has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism.

Reported mortality of dogs with primary IMHA ranges from 26 per cent to 70 per cent, with thromboembolism being linked with a poor clinical outcome28.

The pathophysiology of hypercoagulability in IMHA is complex, and several factors have been hypothesised to play a role – such as decreased concentration of fibrinolytic or anticoagulant factors, increased procoagulant factors, enhanced platelet reactivity and presence of antiphospholipid antibodies.

Scott-Moncrieff et al (2001) reported hypercoagulability as a common finding in dogs with IMHA at the time of clinical presentation, and documented decreased antithrombin activity and thrombocytopenia in 50 per cent and 65 per cent of dogs, respectively. Most of these dogs had also increased fibrinogen concentration.

In this study, long-term mortality was 30 per cent, with thromboembolism being the most common cause29.

Clinical outcome prediction

Other studies have reported the use of thromboelastography (TEG) to identify hypercoagulability in dogs with IMHA, and data indicate that coagulation index at hospital admission may be predictive of clinical outcome.

Whereas most of the dogs exhibited TEG profiles consistent with hypercoagulable state, a normal TEG profile was unexpectedly linked with a higher incidence of death – and it was hypothesised that consumptive coagulopathy may be responsible for the poorer outcome in dogs with relative hypocoagulability at initial presentation30,31.

Intravascular haemagglutination in animals with IMHA has been hypothesised to be the reason for development of SEC due to the increased reflective surface of red blood cells32. The most commonly observed site of thromboembolism in dogs with IMHA is in the lungs, but other sites include the cranial vena cava, heart, spleen and kidney31.

SEC is commonly detected in the splenic and portal veins; however, in a recent review of diagnostic imaging for the evaluation of abdominal vascular diseases, Specchi and d’Anjou (2019) reported that in their experience SEC can also be seen in other abdominal veins of small animals affected by IMHA32.

Spontaneous portal vein thrombosis is not a common event in dogs, and diagnosis is rarely made antemortem.

In dogs, it can occur secondarily to several pathological conditions – including autoimmune disease, pancreatitis, renal amyloidosis and hepatic neoplasm; however, the underlying cause is not always identified32,33.

Lamb et al (1996) reported a case series of portal vein thrombosis detected ultrasonographically in four dogs diagnosed with protein-losing enteropathy (PLN) and probable IMHA, pancreatitis and haemorrhagic gastroenteritis (HGE), chronic ehrlichiosis, and duodenal neoplasm, respectively. Three out of four dogs had decreased portal blood flow and portal hypertension, and hypercoagulability was suspected to be present in two dogs, specifically those diagnosed with pancreatitis/HGE and PLN/IMHA33.

Splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) is the most common disease that affects the splenic vein in both humans and dogs. SVT is often an incidental finding observed on routine abdominal ultrasonography in dogs, and rarely it leads to clinical symptoms; therefore, investigation of the underlying causes is required to understand the clinical significance of SVT.

In a recent case report, one dog with history of hyperadrenocorticism and concurrent pancreatitis was diagnosed ultrasonographically with acute SVT. Possible hypercoagulable state was not investigated; however, the dog completely recovered after splenectomy34.

Laurenson et al (2010) reported on concurrent conditions in dogs with SVT and found that SVT occurred most commonly as a sequel to neoplastic disease, with lymphoma being the most represented neoplasm. Other causes included immune‑mediated disorders, endocrine diseases, DIC and pancreatitis35.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SEC is considered a marker of increased thromboembolic risk on the basis of its association with low blood flow and hypercoagulable state.

Thrombosis is increasingly recognised as a cause of mortality in veterinary medicine and mechanisms that contribute to development of a prothrombotic tendency have been identified in several disorders, including cardiac disease and IMHA.

The incidence and prognostic significance of SEC in relation to cardiac disease has been thoroughly investigated; however, a lack of knowledge exists about association between SEC and risk of thromboembolism in IMHA; therefore, this may be considered an interesting aspect for future research.

References

  • Ito T and Suwa M (2019). Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: relationship with clinical and echocardiographic parameters, Echo Res Pract 6(2): R65-R73.
  • Kupczyńska K, Kasprzak J, Michalski B and Lipiec P (2013). Prognostic significance of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast detected by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the era of harmonic imaging, Arch Med Sci 9(5): 808-814.
  • Ha JW, Chung N, Kang SM, Jang KJ, Kim IJ, Rim SJ, Jang Y, Shim WH, Cho SY and Kim SS (2000). Enhanced detection of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast by transthoracic harmonic imaging in mitral stenosis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13(9): 849-854.
  • Fatkin D, Loupas T, Jacobs N and Feneley MP (1995). Quantification of blood echogenicity: evaluation of a semiquantitative method of grading spontaneous echo contrast, Ultrasound Med Biol 21(9): 1,191-1,198.
  • Black IW (2000). Spontaneous echo contrast: where there’s smoke there’s fire, Echocardiography 17(4): 373-382.
  • Castello R, Pearson AC and Labovitz AJ (1990). Prevalence and clinical implications of atrial spontaneous contrast in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, Am J Cardiol 65(16): 1,149-1,153.
  • Black IW, Hopkins AP, Lee LC and Walsh WF (1991). Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: a clinical and echocardiographic analysis, J Am Coll Cardiol 18(2): 398-404.
  • Dawn B, Varma J, Singh P, Longaker RA and Stoddard MF (2005). Cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation is better predicted by left atrial thrombus and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast as compared with clinical parameters, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(3): 199-205.
  • Fatkin D, Kelly RP and Feneley MP (1994). Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo, J Am Coll Cardiol 23(4): 961-969.
  • Shen WF, Tribouilloy C, Rida Z, Peltier M, Choquet D, Rey JL and Lesbre JP (1996). Clinical significance of intracavitary spontaneous echo contrast in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, Cardiology 87(2): 141-146.
  • Sadanandan S and Sherrid MV (2000). Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in sinus rhythm, J Am Coll Cardiology 35(7): 1,932-1,938.
  • Kellihan HB, Stepien RL, Hassen KM and Smith LJ (2015). Sedative and echocardiographic effects of dexmedetomidine combined with butorphanol in healthy dogs, J Vet Cardiol 17(4): 282-292.
  • Hwang JJ, Shyu KG, Hsu KL, Chen JJ, Kuan P and Lien WP (1994). Significant mitral regurgitation is protective against left atrial spontaneous echo contrast formation, but not against systemic embolism, Chest 106(1): 8-12.
  • Kittrell D and Berkwitt L (2012). Hypercoagulability in dogs: pathophysiology, Compend Contin Educ Vet 34(4): E1-E5.
  • Fareed J, Hoppensteadt DA, Leya F, Iqbal O, Wolf H and Bick R (1998). Useful laboratory tests for studying thrombogenesis in acute cardiac syndromes, Clin Chem 44(8): 1,845-1,853.
  • Black IW, Chesterman CN, Hopkins AP, Lee LC, Chong BH and Walsh WF (1993). Hematologic correlates of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, J Am Coll Cardiol 21(2): 451-457.
  • Heppell RM, Berkin KE, McLenachan JM and Davies JA (1997). Haemostatic and haemodynamic abnormalities associated with left atrial thrombosis in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation, Heart 77(5): 407-411.
  • Wan H, Wu S, Yang Y, Zhu J, Zhang A and Liang Y (2017). Plasma fibrin D-dimer and the risk of left atrial thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, PLOS One 12(2): e0172272.
  • Sahin O and Savas G (2019). Relationship between presence of spontaneous echo contrast and platelet‑to‑lymphocyte ratio in patients with mitral stenosis, Echocardiography 36(5): 924-929.
  • Payne JR, Borgeat K, Connolly DJ, Boswood A, Dennis S, Wagner T, Menaut P, Maerz I, Evans D, Simons VE, Brodbelt DC, and Luis Fuentes V (2013). Prognostic indicators in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, J Vet Intern Med 27(6): 1,427-1,436.
  • Payne JR, Borgeat K, Brodbelt DC, Connolly DJ and Luis Fuentes V (2015). Risk factors associated with sudden death vs congestive heart failure or arterial thromboembolism in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, J Vet Cardiol 17(Suppl 1): S318-S328.
  • Schober KE and Maerz I (2006). Assessment of left atrial appendage flow velocity and its relation to spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in 89 cats with myocardial disease, J Vet Intern Med 20(1): 120-130.
  • Peck CM, Nielsen LK, Quinn RL, Laste NJ and Price LL (2016). Retrospective evaluation of the incidence and prognostic significance of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in relation to cardiac disease and congestive heart failure in cats: 725 cases (2006-2011), J Vet Emerg Crit Care 26(5): 704-712.
  • Stokol T, Brooks M, Rush JE, Rishniw M, Erb H, Rozanski E, Kraus MS and Gelzer AL (2008). Hypercoagulability in cats with cardiomyopathy, J Vet Intern Med 22(3): 546-552.
  • Ralph AG, Saunders AB, Hariu CD and Nabity M (2011). Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in three dogs, J Vet Emerg Crit Care 21(2): 158-165.
  • Mahony C and Ferguson JM (1992). Development of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast after surgical trauma, J Ultrasound Med 11(5): 189-194.
  • Winter RL, Remaks JD and Newhard DK (2020). Development of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast after transarterial occlusion of a patent ductus arteriosus in an adult dog with concurrent pulmonary hypertension, Front Vet Sci 26(7): 103.
  • Hamzianpour N and Chan DL (2016). Thromboelastographic assessment of the contribution of platelets and clotting proteases to the hypercoagulable state of dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, J Vet Emerg Crit Care 26(2): 295-299.
  • Scott-Moncrieff JC, Treadwell NG, McCullough SM and Brooks MB (2001). Hemostatic abnormalities in dogs with primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 37(3): 220-227.
  • Sinnott VB and Otto CM (2009). Use of thromboelastography in dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia: 39 cases (2000-2008), J Vet Emerg Crit Care 19(5): 484-488.
  • Goggs R, Wiinberg B, Kjelgaard-Hansen M and Chan DL (2012). Serial assessment of the coagulation status of dogs with immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia using thromboelastography, Vet J 191(3): 347-353.
  • Specchi S and d’Anjou MA (2019). Diagnostic imaging for the assessment of acquired abdominal vascular diseases in small animals: a pictorial review, Vet Radiol Ultrasound 60(6): 613-632.
  • Lamb CR, Wrigley RH, Simpson KW, Forster‑van Hijfte M and Garden OA (1996). Ultrasonographic diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis in four dogs, Vet Radiol Ultrasound 37(2): 121-129.
  • Kim J (2019). A case of acute splenic vein thrombosis, J Vet Med Sci 81(10): 1,492-1,495.
  • Laurenson MP, Hopper K, Herrera MA and Johnson EG (2010). Concurrent diseases and conditions in dogs with splenic vein thrombosis, J Vet Intern Med 24(6): 1,298-1,304.

Meet the authors

author_img

Mairi Frame

Job Title
author_img

Viola Vannucci

Job Title
‌
‌
‌