Register

Login

Vet Times logo
  • Register
  • Login
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + Media
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Crossword
  • View all clinical
  • Clinical hubs
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • Job Seekers
  • Career Advice
About
Vet Times App
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs

Search Articles & More

Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingInternational

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

Media

VideosPodcastsDigital EditionCrossword

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Vet Times App

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

International

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Clinical hubs

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

Job Seekers

Career Advice

Media

All Media content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition

Crossword


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2026

IPSO_regulated

30 Jul 2026

VBJ: Clean smarter, not harder: microfibre cleaning and targeted disinfection

Environmental hygiene is often viewed as a fixed cost within veterinary practice, rather than a contributor to clinical and business performance. However, evidence from human health care and emerging veterinary insights shows effective cleaning systems can improve efficiency, reduce infection risks, support antimicrobial stewardship and lower operational costs…

author_img

Lisa Tolfree

Job Title



VBJ: Clean smarter, not harder: microfibre cleaning and targeted disinfection

Image: Maridav / iStock

In veterinary practice, environmental hygiene is essential, but often invisible in terms of strategic value. It is typically treated as a routine operational requirement rather than a factor that influences productivity, patient outcomes, or financial performance.

However, increasing pressures around antimicrobial resistance (AMR), staffing constraints and rising operational costs are shifting this perspective. There is growing recognition that how we clean matters as much as what we clean.

Evidence from human health care demonstrates that improved environmental hygiene reduces pathogen transmission and supports infection prevention (Dancer, 2009; Weber et al, 2013). Translating these principles into veterinary practice creates an opportunity not only to improve infection prevention and control (IPC), but to strengthen overall business performance.

Microfibre cleaning

High quality microfibre cleaning systems differ from traditional cotton-based approaches by focusing on mechanical removal of contamination, rather than relying heavily on chemicals.

The ultrafine fibres:

  • Penetrate microscopic surface irregularities
  • Lift and trap organic matter and microorganisms
  • Prevent redistribution of contamination

Studies in health care environments have shown that microfibre cloths are more effective than traditional materials at reducing microbial contamination on surfaces (Smith et al, 2011).

The biofilm challenge

A key limitation of traditional cleaning is its inability to address biofilm build-up; layers of microorganisms protected by a gel-like matrix that attach to surfaces such as sinks, drains, cages and equipment.

These biofilms:

  • Protect bacteria from disinfectants
  • Persist despite routine cleaning
  • Act as ongoing sources of contamination
  • This has direct practical implications:
  • Surfaces may appear clean but remain contaminated
  • Bacteria can quickly re-establish after cleaning
  • Infection risks can persist unseen and unnoticed

Disinfection alone is often ineffective against biofilms, as chemical agents struggle to penetrate the protective matrix. Mechanical disruption is essential, making microfibre an important tool for removing this hidden contamination.

Benefits

Microfibre systems are lighter, simpler to use and more efficient:

  • Cleaning times reduced by up to 30 per cent to 40 per cent
  • Less need for repeated water changes
  • Improved workflow across teams

This all allows staff to focus on clinical priorities rather than repetitive cleaning processes.

Reduced consumable costs

Reusable high-quality microfibre cloths and mops:

  • Last for hundreds of wash cycles
  • Reduce reliance on disposable wipes and paper products
  • Deliver lower cost per use over time

Lower water and chemical use

High-quality microfibre cleaning typically uses significantly less water than traditional methods and can be performed using water alone for routine cleaning.

This leads to:

  • Reduced utility costs
  • Lower chemical expenditure
  • Improved environmental sustainability

Smarter use of chemicals

Risk-based approach

Disinfection remains essential to break chains of infection, but its use should be targeted rather than routine. A structured, two-step approach is recommended:

  1. Clean first (remove contamination using microfibre)
  2. Disinfect where clinically indicated

Appropriate use includes:

  • Isolation areas
  • Known or suspected contamination events (for example, blood, urine or infectious cases)
  • High-touch and critical contact surfaces (for example, door handles or consultation tables)

This approach improves effectiveness while avoiding overuse of chemicals.

Image: themanofsteel / Adobe Stock

AMR: why it matters

There is increasing concern that overuse or incorrect use of disinfectants, particularly quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), may contribute to antimicrobial resistance.

Mechanisms include:

  • Selection of less-susceptible organisms
  • Efflux pump activity leading to cross-resistance
  • Co-selection of antibiotic resistance genes (Buffet-Bataillon et al, 2016; Maillard, 2018)

Suboptimal use such as incorrect dilution or insufficient contact time can further promote microbial adaptation.

By reducing unnecessary disinfectant use, practices can:

  • Lower selective pressure on microorganisms
  • Support antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)
  • Align with one health principles

Clinical impact: reducing infection risk

Improved environmental hygiene lowers the overall microbial burden within the practice environment. This contributes to:

  • Fewer postoperative complications
  • Reduced need for precautionary antibiotic use
  • Lower risk of veterinary care-associated infections (VCAIs)

This approach leads to fewer postoperative complications and unplanned rechecks, reduces unnecessary antibiotic use, and lowers the risk of antimicrobial resistance, side effects and costs while supporting antimicrobial stewardship and one health principles.

Although veterinary-specific outcome data remains limited, human health care research consistently demonstrates a link between improved cleaning and reduced transmission of health care-associated pathogens (Otter et al, 2011).

Hidden costs of inefficient cleaning

Inadequate cleaning does not just affect hygiene – it creates significant hidden costs.

Infection and clinical risk

  • Repeat infections and complications
  • Longer treatment courses
  • Increased antibiotic use
  • Patient impact – increased pain, side effects

Lost productivity

  • Time spent re-cleaning after failed environmental hygiene monitoring
  • Disruption from reactive outbreak management
  • Reduced number of patients treated

Increased financial burden

  • Higher spend on chemicals and consumables
  • Additional staff time
  • Equipment replacement costs
  • PPE and isolation requirements

Even a single infection outbreak can have substantial financial implications.

Compliance and reputation

Poor cleaning outcomes can impact:

  • RCVS Practice Standards Scheme (PSS) assessments
  • Client confidence and perception of quality

This can lead to increased scrutiny, reporting requirements and financial pressure.

Making cleaning measurable

To deliver consistent results, cleaning must be standardised and able to be audited.

  • Objective monitoring tools:
  • UV marker testing – verifies whether surfaces have been physically cleaned
  • ATP testing – provides rapid measurement of organic matter contamination
  • Infection surveillance – identifies trends and early risks

These tools transform cleaning into a data-driven quality process, improving accountability, and supporting continuous improvement. All three methods are recognised for RCVS PSS assessment.

Return on investment

Although introducing microfibre systems and monitoring tools requires initial investment, the financial return is typically realised through:

  • Reduced chemical and consumable costs
  • Lower water and energy expenditure
  • Increased staff efficiency
  • Avoidance of high-cost infection events
  • Extended lifespan of equipment

This makes environmental hygiene one of the few areas where practices can simultaneously:

  • Reduce costs
  • Improve clinical outcomes
  • Enhance sustainability

Workforce, reputation and sustainability

Modern veterinary teams increasingly value safe, efficient and environmentally responsible workplaces.

Practices adopting improved IPC systems often experience:

  • Improved staff engagement and morale
  • Better recruitment and retention
  • Increased client trust

A visibly clean, well-managed environment reinforces professionalism and supports long-term client loyalty.

At Inspiring Vet Care sustainable environmental hygiene methods play a role in our Positive Pawprint sustainability strategy, caring for our people, our patients and our planet, recognising our responsibility to take care of environmental impact and demonstrating our commitment to set new standards for environmental sustainability in veterinary care.

Conclusion

Microfibre cleaning, combined with targeted disinfection, represents a shift from routine cleaning to a strategic, evidence-informed approach to infection prevention.

When supported by training, standardisation and monitoring, this model can deliver measurable benefits across clinical outcomes, operational efficiency and business performance.

In an environment of rising costs and workforce pressures, cleaning smarter not harder offers a practical and sustainable competitive advantage for veterinary practices.

References

Buffet-Bataillon S et al (2016). Efflux pump induction by quaternary ammonium compounds and fluoroquinolone resistance in bacteria, Future Microbiology 11(1): 81-92.
Dancer SJ (2009). The role of environmental cleaning in the control of hospital-acquired infection, Journal of Hospital Infection 73(4): 378-385.
Maillard JY (2018). Resistance of bacteria to biocides, Microbiology Spectrum 6(2): 10.1128.
Otter JA, Yezli S and French GL (2011). The role of contaminated surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 32(7): 687–699.
Smith DL et al (2011). Assessing the efficacy of different microfibre cloths at removing surface micro-organisms associated with healthcare-associated infections, Journal of Hospital Infection 78(3): 182-186.
Weber DJ, Anderson D and Rutala WA (2013). The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections, Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 26(4): 338-344.
World Health Organization (2016). Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programmes, WHO, Geneva.
  • This article appeared in VBJ (July 2026), Issue 280, Pages 12-15

Lisa Tolfree is a senior referral nurse and IPC Manager UK and Ireland for Inspiring Vet Care.