‌

Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • Vet Times jobs home
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital Edition

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

26 Mar 2024

Evidence-based approach to claw-horn lesions in herds

With mean lameness prevalence in UK and worldwide herds around a third, and the livestock sector facing increasing cost pressures, tackling it remains an important focus. This article, the first in a two-parter, looks at research for a key condition.

author_img

Jessica Reynolds

Job Title



Evidence-based approach to claw-horn lesions in herds

Image @ Irisalsoog / Adobe Stock

Lameness is an endemic issue in the UK dairy industry, with severe financial and welfare implications and significant impacts on industry public perception (von Keyserlingk and Weary, 2017).

UK mean lameness prevalence is estimated to be 31.6% (Griffiths et al, 2018), with similar worldwide approximations (Solano et al, 2015). Historical economic cost of white line disease has been estimated at £300 and sole ulceration at £519 per case, including direct (treatment, labour and increased waste milk) and indirect (reduced milk yield and fertility, plus increased culling risk) costs (Willshire and Bell, 2009). Accounting for inflation since this research, current financial cost is estimated to be 1.3 times higher than documented (Newsome et al, 2019).

As the industry rightly becomes under increasing pressure to reduce lameness prevalence, both for welfare and socioeconomic reasons, the role of the farm vet is ever-more important in coordinating a multi-disciplinary effort to manage lameness on farm. This article is part of a two-part series aiming to present the reader with an evidence-based approach for investigating lameness in the dairy herd, with particular focus on developing research pertaining to claw-horn lesion (CHL) aetiology, management and prevention.

Pathophysiology of CHL development in dairy cattle

Aetiopathogenesis of white line lesions and solar lesions are hypothesised to have similar origins (Lischer et al, 2002). Application of excessive ground-reaction force to solar germinal epithelium disrupts the dermal layer and prevents appropriate growth and keratinisation of hoof horn, resulting in solar and white line haemorrhage (Hoblet and Weiss, 2001).

In later stages of disease, this leads to solar ulceration or undersole separation due to impaired horn production (Tadich et al, 2010) or impaction and separation of the white line (Winkler and Margerison, 2012), increasing risk of foreign body entrance (Leach et al, 1997). Mobilisation of fat (commonly postpartum) from the digital cushion further reduces shock absorbance capacity (Newsome et al, 2017a; 2017b), which – alongside weakening hoof suspensory apparatus surrounding parturition (Tarlton et al, 2002) – increases risk of epithelial trauma. The ensuing inflammation generates a periosteal reaction within the distal phalanx, resulting in exostoses formation, increasing scarring of the digital cushion. This reduces shock dissipation and increases pressure on the germinal epithelium, further perpetuating the cycle of epithelial damage and further CHL (Newsome et al, 2017a; 2017b).

Extrinsic environmental factors, such as abrasive flooring surface, decreased lying time, increased competition for resources and social competition, increase risk of foot exposure to abnormal force loads, which, combined with intrinsic physiological events, negatively impacts force dissipation within the foot and increases risk of CHL development (Bicalho and Oikonomou, 2013).

Example herd case

A real herd example now follows to demonstrate how the combination of herd and individual cow level data analysis and consequent evidence-based recommendations can form the basis of the successful investigation of a lameness problem in the dairy herd.

History

Prior to history taking and starting consultation, using appropriate communication techniques is vital in establishing an effective working relationship and a farmer’s own reasons for tackling a lameness problem, if any. Unfortunately, large differences are reported between farmer-observed and trained mobility scorer records of lameness (Leach et al, 2010), with motivation for starting control programmes sometimes originating from the practitioner and reducing success of any proposed control measures before they have even started.

Use of motivational interviewing, rather than a directive style of communication, is evidence-based and can help foster two-way conversations, enabling farmers to discuss their perception of problems on farm and potential solutions, improving success of farmer-vet collaboration (Bard et al, 2017). 

The example herd requested an investigation through its first opinion veterinary surgeon, reporting an increasing prevalence of lameness with a number of chronic cases.

Initial details of the farm were:

  • A 300 cow Holstein Friesian dual block calving herd, averaging 9,000L per year.
  • All year-round housed early lactation and transition group and later lactation/early dry cows grazed seasonally.
  • Intermittently mobility scored by an external Register of Mobility Scorers-accredited scorer using a 0 to 3 scale, where score 0 to 1 was sound and score 2 to 3 was lame (Whay et al, 2003).
  • Foot trimming every six weeks to perform routine trims of cows at drying off and in-calf heifers prior to calving, alongside treatment trims of score 3 cows only.

Farm assessment and data analysis

Assessment of farm environment, foot trimming, cow factors and collection of mobility score and foot trimming data form the basis of investigating a lameness problem on farm.

In terms of data analysis, commonly used key performance indicators for mobility score and lameness treatment data are shown in Table 1.

​Table 1. Lameness key performance indicators (Huxley et al, 2012)
Lameness key performance indicator Description Target
Newly lame cows (identified by mobility score, calculated from two consecutive fortnightly or monthly recordings) Number of cows moving into score 2 or 3 as a percentage of those at a score 0 or 1 at previous recording Below 1% to 5%
Chronically lame cows (identified and calculated as above) Number of cows consistently recorded as a score 2 or 3, in consecutive recordings as a percentage of all those at a score 2 or 3 at previous scoring Below 25%
Recovered lame cows (identified and calculated as above) Number of cows recorded as a score 0 or 1 as a percentage of all those at a score 2 or 3 at previous scoring More than 75%
Lameness index (identified by mobility score) Percentage lame (score 2 and 3) Below 10% to 15%
Percentage severely lame (score 3) Below 1% to 2%
Incidence rate of lameness cases (identified by cases treated for lameness) Number of cows treated for lameness/100 cows at risk/year Below 10% to 20%
Frequency of mobility scoring Every 2 weeks
Time between identification and treatment of lame cows Lame (score 2) Maximum 48h
Severely lame (score 3) Maximum 24h

Caution should be exercised when using solely treatment data to benchmark or draw conclusions about herd lameness, as a high treatment incidence may represent increased prevalence of lameness or quick and accurate detection of cases.

Initially assessing mobility score data to benchmark lameness prevalence over time and proportion of newly and chronically affected cows by month can help direct further data analysis. Available data for this example herd is shown in Figure 1. Lameness prevalence (score 2 and 3 cows) was consistently between 35% and 40% (Figure 1a), with proportion of new and chronically lame cattle identified from mobility score data shown in Figure 1b.

Figure 1. Mobility score data from 2022. Figure 1a. Percentage prevalence of lameness by severity score (score 0 to 3) across months.
Figure 1b. Percentage prevalence of newly lame cows (new score 2 or 3, previously score 0 or 1) and chronically lame cows (score 2 or 3 in two consecutive mobility scores), across months.

Assessing lameness treatment data from foot trimmer visits or farmer treatment must also be analysed to assess common lesions and identify any patterns noted over time or in different animal groups (days in milk [DIM] or parity, for example). In this herd, CHLs were the most prevalent lesion type identified (Figure 2a), at 77% of all 259 lesions reported. Infectious lesions and general lameness or swollen legs represented the remainder of lesions.

Treatment data and mobility score data were then combined to detect the predominant lesion affecting cows identified as newly and chronically lame by mobility score (Figure 2b). Only 17.6% (9 cows), 18.2% (8 cows) and 4.76% (1 cow) of newly lame cows in months with relevant scoring received a treatment. CHLs were the most prevalent lesion associated with new and chronic lameness; few newly lame cows (17 cows) were treated, so it is difficult to establish causality; however, toe necrosis and sole ulcer represented the most common lesion detected in chronically lame cows.

Figure 2. Lameness treatment data from November 2021 to November 2022. Figure 2a. All treatments administered by farm staff or the foot trimmer to score 2 or 3 cows.
Figure 2b. Incidence of treatment in cows mobility scored as newly and chronically lame.

Distribution of CHL recorded (201 lesions) was analysed by DIM, parity, month of treatment, number of treatments per cow and foot treated for white line disease only. A quarter of cases required more than one treatment, with all toe necrosis cases reported representing repeated treatment of just six cows.

Frequency of CHL recorded increased in October and November, which was suspected to be due to an increased rate of CHL development in housed cows crowding around a fan in an August heatwave and increased treatment sessions in response to mobility scores.

Following assessment of data, visiting the farm to contextualise findings and assess farm environment and housing, relevant cow factors and foot trimming technique is strongly advised. This herd was visited during a trimming session, when cows were housed, and the following observations were made:

1. Trimming session

  • Dutch five-step method used (Toussaint Raven, 1985).
  • Blocks on non-painful claw only if sole ulcer present.
  • NSAID use.
  • Sole haemorrhage was mostly identified by the author (80%; 20 out of 25 cows).
  • Lesions recorded by the trimmer as undersole separation actually identified by the author to represent sole haemorrhage or ulcer.

2. Environmental assessment

  • Foot bath containing 4% formalin, measuring 4m long by 1.5m wide by 0.3m high; volume is 720L at 12cm solution depth, used for all milking cows twice daily, five days a week on milking parlour exit. Contents were replenished daily.
  • Milking cow and early dry cow housing assessment was carried out.

3. Cow assessment

  • A total of 66% of the herd achieved target body condition scores (BCS) of between 2.5 and 3 (Garnsworthy, 2011), with no cows scoring below a BCS of 2.5.

Conclusion

Data and farm assessment for this herd showed that increased prevalence of lameness was found to be most commonly due to sole ulcer and sole haemorrhage CHL, with decreased frequency of detection and delayed inadequate treatment of new cases. Housing assessment revealed no additional cubicles for cow numbers and poor cubicle design, increasing risk of prolonged standing time and contributing to CHL development.

Recommendations based on early detection of lameness and prompt, effective treatment to maximise chance of recovery combined with environmental management to reduce external pressure on the feet, and incidence of new CHL, are covered in the second part of this series.

‌
‌
‌