Register

Login

+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • Vet Times jobs home
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinanceDigitalPractice profilesPractice developments

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital Edition

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Digital

Practice profiles

Practice developments

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

28 Feb 2024

Raw meat fears branded ‘alarmist’ by diet’s supporters

A “cross-profession initiative” to reduce perceived risks of feeding raw pet food had been mooted, but  proponents said owners enjoyed “healthy relationship” with their raw-fed pets.

author_img

Allister Webb

Job Title



Raw meat fears branded ‘alarmist’ by diet’s supporters

Image © Tatyana Gladskih / Adobe Stock

Fears of a major disease outbreak associated with pets’ consumption of raw meat products have been branded “alarmist” by prominent supporters of the diets.

Senior figures in both the animal and human health spheres have been urged to launch a “cross-profession initiative” to reduce the perceived risks.

But prominent agencies within the veterinary sector have so far remained tight-lipped on the issue.

Controversy

The new controversy has broken out following the release of an open letter by vet and academic Mike Davies, in which he argued that human cases of several illnesses could be linked to contact with pets that had been fed raw meat foods.

He also raised concerns about the potential for diseases such as brucellosis and listeriosis to be brought into the country through meat imports and highlighted APHA figures from 2021 and 2022, which indicated significant increases in the reporting of both Salmonella and the isolation of regulated serovars in raw meat products.

The document further warned that consumer confidence was being unduly enhanced by the RawSafe accreditation scheme which Dr Davies branded as “disingenuous to say the least as the truth is that feeding raw meats can never be safe unless it is treated, for example by cooking, to kill pathogens.”

He continued: “My main concerns are the apparent lack of compliance with health standards by the industry, and that nobody is currently advising owners about the risks that raw-fed pets present to high-risk people who may come into contact with it or its environment.”

‘Open minds’

But the scheme’s directors have urged vets to “open their minds” and support clients who choose raw diets for their pets.

Meanwhile, Amaya Espindola, president of the Raw Feeding Veterinary Society, said her organisation was unclear about the scientific basis for what she described as Dr Davies’ “alarmist remarks”.

She said: “We have a number of members who have been using real food as therapy for many years and none of them has experienced any of the alarming events mentioned by Dr Davies.

“They continue to enjoy a healthy relationship with their own raw-fed pets as well as interacting with those of their clients on a regular basis.

“To believe that we can live in a world devoid of bacteria and bacterial risk, from both environment to human, human to human and animal to human is to fail to understand the beautiful complexity of the interlinked world in which we live.”

As well as Vet Times, the letter was addressed to the current health secretary, Victoria Atkins, leading public health officials, the BMA and senior representatives of both the APHA and the RCVS.

‘Obvious steps’

Dr Davies wrote: “I do not need to spell out obvious steps that could or should be taken to minimise the risks to human health.

“I trust that you will agree that action is needed now and organise a cross-profession initiative before we see more unnecessary fatalities or a major outbreak.”

But the college declined to comment on the issue, which it argued falls outside its remit, while the APHA had not provided a response at the time of going to press.